Question in our ongoing VC match

Are we allowed to read the analysis of a match between Ding and Anand,

when we are playing this match?

@Toldsted provided links to that match analysis

We are white, like Ding, but black was winning that match

move 14 - we have white

https://www.chess.com/votechess/game/269265?activePagination=archive&mv=26&san=Na4

arecinos

1 day ago

0

petitbonom wrote:

Are we allowed to refer to the Ding game in the article ?

This enters dodgy territory for me.

I was wondering about that too, because one of the articles referenced below gave some engine analyses of move options.

petitbonom

1 day ago

0

Are we allowed to refer to the Ding game in the article ?

This enters dodgy territory for me.

pensive_Karishma

2 days ago

0

HenryMasky wrote:

N a 4 now or one move before

haha funny !! agree, I see no hurry-burry in capturing that silly+naughty pawn yet, it's no going far , actually it's coming to us from the other side, maybe it's a goody pawn?

2

1

pensive_Karishma

2 days ago

0

Toldsted wrote:

Colefinger wrote:

Why didn't Ding take the pawn?

He just found Na4 to be better, and regrettet that he did't play it a move earlier ;-)

lol good one

if only Ding had commented his exact regret (move#) our task would be much simpler, right?

3

Colefinger

2 days ago

0

All right; then I am convinced (or did I once more put two small pieces of paper into a black hat?)

You voted for 14. Na4

14. Na4 (83%, 5 Votes)

14. Rxd3 (17%, 1 Vote)

2

1

1

1

Toldsted

2 days ago

0

And the game is also commented here at chess.com: https://www.chess.com/news/view/carlsen-wins-lindores-abbey-chess-stars-tournament

2

Toldsted

2 days ago

0

And maybe Ding was just winning until blundering it all in the end. This site suggest that: https://en.chessbase.com/post/magnus-carlsen-wins-his-fifth-title-of-the-year-the-lindores-abbey-chess-2019

2

Toldsted

0

Colefinger wrote:

May I ask those of you who favor 14. Na4: Where/on what move do you intend to deviate from the game Ding - Anand (2019): https://www.chess.com/games/view/15587073

I was a rapid game, so there is probably plenty of opportunities. It is actualle live commented here: https://chess24.com/en/read/news/magnus-lives-dangerously-but-wins-in-lindores

Their analyses of 18.e5!? may be improved.

At first sight already 17.a3 looks a bit weird. As we experience in the game it does not stop Nb4, but it do stop the fork treatening a2. Can't that be done in a more effecient way?

3

Dragon Lovers HQ

Super Admins