What is wrong with this diagram??
Sort:
Jul 4, 2007
0
#2
problem: both sides are making really dumb moves??
and if you're going to say that the knight should be on c3 instead of b3, that is not necessarily true since you could go to c3, b5, d4, then b3 while black plays the bishop or another piece back and forth. ;)
Yep,I was thinking of that when i made it.Then i said im not going through the troubles to find a square thats impossible for a knight to be on so i just left it there.Only skilled chess players like yourself would notice.But also if u say that its possible to go through all those moves it's not.Since black would need to move pices which it didnt showing that there were only 3 turns.So theres no mistake in this :). Or i hope so.Nice eye for figuring out a possiblity of it going there.
i agree with eric i see almost NO piece developement
Bump
Mar 20, 2024
0
#6
peekaboo skrev:
... But also if u say that its possible to go through all those moves it's not.Since black would need to move pices which it didnt showing that there were only 3 turns...
Nope. No one knows how many moves Black has done.
This position can come forward with legal (but dumb) moves. So nothing wrong with the position.