1.e4 b5!?

3 Bishop e2!No compensation. 

then 3...d5 anyway

mr basman has played before and won (Against much weaker opposition though, like chess experts). but its just a terrible move. Black forfeits a pawn and he doesnt even have a lead in development for it. 

#63
No that is not true. IM Basman did play 1...a6, 2...b5, 1...b5, 2...a6, 1...g5, 2...h6, 1...h6 2...g5, 1...a6 2...h6, but he never sacrificed the pawn. He played this even against grandmasters.
https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1026325 

after 41.Rxc4 in @Ben_Dubuque's diagram in post #20 there is 41.f3+ winning white's rook and the game!

Hello

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dy8HIaC_Fw

there he is sacrificing the pawn on move 1. The opponent an expert chickened out but took it anyways a few moves later.

sent me a challenge if you feel like it's time to break your streak

Are you sure this is not antichess

Look also at my thread here:

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/polish-gambit-interesting-sharp-line

P03: Miller-Lamar Countergambit (Instead of taking with bishop, a4?! attempts to bring the rook out.

bruh xd

bombaclat