this is like the bongcloud, it’s not supposed to be taken seriously so you play it to disrespect your opponent.
Creating my own opening?
If you're playing unusual moves you do occasionally encounter moves the engine suggests that have not been played. It's not common but it happens. I wouldn't really call that creativity though since it's just an engine suggesting something. Most of the creativity in the opening is in the repertoire you select and the style of play as a whole..
Some people play a very bland repertoire that has been seen a hundred million times, others have a very unique repertoire full of novelties. I've been playing strategy games for a very long time, since I was like 8 or so... all different kinds of games including RTS, turn based, MOBAs, and others. One thing I've always noticed about the top players is they always do something that is both novel and solid. Some players try to play completely solidly and soundly, but they end up playing very by the book and predictably. For whatever reason Western players especially try to play this way... From my experience that can get you to "good" but never "great". On the other hand... you have players that try to be creative, but they are not practical enough and it just doesn't work. Really good creativity blends into practicality
is that possible??? with all the great chess masters of the past doing it before you -- could you actually come up with a new opening ??????????- time will tell
The annotations are in my opinion, please do not correct me. I even have some comments about it.
Knight's Opening: Value's Defense: Spaniards Variation
This chess opening is called Illegal opening, don't try this opening or it will arrested you at ChessBaka, ChessBaka+
If you play at my job, you're fired.
i know im late by like 13 years but heres an idea: The Semi-Slav Gambit. It allows a queen trade, some developing for white and black, castling, and its brand new!
1. This isn't a "gambit" (no pawn is offered by any side).
2. It is effectively a Queen's gambit accepted, a whole tempo down for Black (...c5 played in two moves instead of one).
So, not a terribly good idea.
Everything you move has names maybe.But dont loose your creativity neither your motivation.Maybe the first operture creation had so easy ...now we need to make combinations perhaps unnamed yet.For years I thinked about one that I observed working good and I dont knowed before with a name.Later, I saw thats named double crab or something ,but I worked more steps with Knights and put a name of fantasy one day here in a topic about openings.Now im working in another possible named Big bang.Can work? maybe yes maybe nope but I study thats possibility...The bot not detailed something specific about thats movements ,so I named.My motivation is not only to create.I experiment movements and my mind organize my own memotecnical thinks with names.Is natural to myself in a extense things I make,not only when playing Chess...what is the worst thing can happen with that ....? A time traveller knock your door to say hey..! thats operture was mine playing on Ancient times and was named 2 tyranosaurus on the beach...! ( ? ) ...I prefer do not to be extremelly serious with myself.If a thing I post or I try create generates laughs is okay.😂😂😂
...Im the only one thats imagine and sing songs of bands uncreated...albums and video clips or movies includded ?...🤡
The thing is why we need to name / or and create? Some times can be a practical tool or generousity to apport something new.Ego also can be part of a creation...perhaps is nice to feel like we can be part of Chess creativity.But,in everycases,the thing is if our creation or idea can help or not.I think is a good place here to experiment and share.But also is a communitary behaviour not only sharing our things,but accepting study respectously the ideas of others.If not,is like a orchest making each one their own song.Each one can be a genious, but without armony and respecting share ,the orchest can be a caos.
Franco - Sicilian Spear Stalingrad Counterflanking Attack