Forums

King's Pawn Opening: King's Head Opening

Sort:
Potato50012

Ok. Good to know.

SaltyAsHell
Yigor wrote:
Potato50012 wrote:

Thank you, it would be most welcome.

 

First of all, the following position:

 



 

has an official name: Reversed Damiano Defense

nonsense

Potato50012
SaltyAsHell wrote:
Yigor wrote:
Potato50012 wrote:

Thank you, it would be most welcome.

 

First of all, the following position:

 



 

has an official name: Reversed Damiano Defense

nonsense

How so?

Yigor

Now, if we wanna play seriously starting from the Reversed Damiano Defense, the true Fried Potato Attack (FPA) would be 3. d4! With the optimal play, it will give the following FPA: Two Knights Defense variation bn.pngwq.pngbn.pngwink.png:

 

 

Potato50012

A good observation.

Lastrank

Steinitz played 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 f6 as black on a couple of occasions, with some similarities to The Fried Potato Attack.

Yigor
Potato50012 wrote:

nonsense

How so?

 

Don't pay attention to those arrogant dudes. They just have nothing interesting to say. 

Potato50012
Lastrank wrote:

Steinitz played 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 f6 as black on a couple of occasions, with some similarities to The Fried Potato Attack.

Some, but not many that I can see from what you have given us.

Lastrank
Yigor wrote:

Now, if we wanna play seriously starting from the Reversed Damiano Defense, the true Fried Potato Attack (FPA) would be 3. d4! With the optimal play, it will give the following FPA: Two Knights Defense variation :

 

 

Good!  Moving the queen vacates the d1 square facilitating queen side castling, after which white can launch his kingside pawn storm. 

The theory of the FPA is advancing.  Our hapless opponents, unaware of the theory, won't know what hit them.

 

Potato50012

This forum is turning out much better than I expected.

SaltyAsHell
Yigor wrote:

Now, if we wanna play seriously starting from the Reversed Damiano Defense, the true Fried Potato Attack (FPA) would be 3. d4! With the optimal play, it will give the following FPA: Two Knights Defense variation :

 

 

Completely wrong:

 

Potato50012

That was 4. d4, not 3. d4.

Yigor
SaltyAsHell wrote:

Completely wrong:

 

Dude, we analyzed 2...Nf6, not 2...Bc5. peshka.png

Potato50012

That too.

SaltyAsHell

 

Potato50012

Those are still not the moves that we analyzed for white.

Lastrank

One possibility is to play b3 and develop the bishop to b2, play the queen knight to d2, put the queen on e2 and castle queenside.  Possibly put the light squared bishop on c4 and then start the kingside pawn storm.

Potato50012

I could see that. Most of the time I storm King and Queenside at the same time using the back rank as an anchor, what do you think of that?

Yigor

King's Head: Italian variation: Accelerated Evans gambit (unsound and crazy, but who knows grin.png):

 

 

 

Potato50012

That looks almost like some games I have played.