Thank you, it would be most welcome.
First of all, the following position:
has an official name: Reversed Damiano Defense.
nonsense
Thank you, it would be most welcome.
First of all, the following position:
has an official name: Reversed Damiano Defense.
nonsense
Thank you, it would be most welcome.
First of all, the following position:
has an official name: Reversed Damiano Defense.
nonsense
How so?
Now, if we wanna play seriously starting from the Reversed Damiano Defense, the true Fried Potato Attack (FPA) would be 3. d4! With the optimal play, it will give the following FPA: Two Knights Defense variation :
Steinitz played 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 f6 as black on a couple of occasions, with some similarities to The Fried Potato Attack.
nonsense
How so?
Don't pay attention to those arrogant dudes. They just have nothing interesting to say.
Steinitz played 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 f6 as black on a couple of occasions, with some similarities to The Fried Potato Attack.
Some, but not many that I can see from what you have given us.
Now, if we wanna play seriously starting from the Reversed Damiano Defense, the true Fried Potato Attack (FPA) would be 3. d4! With the optimal play, it will give the following FPA: Two Knights Defense variation :
Good! Moving the queen vacates the d1 square facilitating queen side castling, after which white can launch his kingside pawn storm.
The theory of the FPA is advancing. Our hapless opponents, unaware of the theory, won't know what hit them.
Now, if we wanna play seriously starting from the Reversed Damiano Defense, the true Fried Potato Attack (FPA) would be 3. d4! With the optimal play, it will give the following FPA: Two Knights Defense variation :
Completely wrong:
One possibility is to play b3 and develop the bishop to b2, play the queen knight to d2, put the queen on e2 and castle queenside. Possibly put the light squared bishop on c4 and then start the kingside pawn storm.
Ok. Good to know.