Bad Opening!
You just lost 1 pawn!
You have no development lead!
You are losing with no compensation!
New Chess Opening “Tic Tac Toe Gambit”
Sort:
lolimsocoollol38383 wrote:
Analysis doesn’t say the position is totally losing.
It's not exactly a very high bar you're setting.
The opening doesn't make sense, fiancetto typically leads to a slow positional game, sacrificing a central pawn for initiative doesn't help you in a slow positional game. Black also hasn't made any moves that create vulnerabilities. So you are just really throwing away a pawn for no clear purpose.
Just smth bad between indian and danish
HOW DID YOU MANAGE TO CREATE A TERRIBLE OPENING OUT OF 2 GREAT ONES-DANISH AND INDIAN
ibrust wrote:
lolimsocoollol38383 wrote:
Analysis doesn’t say the position is totally losing.
It's not exactly a very high bar you're setting.
The opening doesn't make sense, fiancetto typically leads to a slow positional game, sacrificing a central pawn for initiative doesn't help you in a slow positional game. Black also hasn't made any moves that create vulnerabilities. So you are just really throwing away a pawn for no clear purpose.
Yes but now the queen is open diagonally
Can you show any attacking line where black plays in a reasonable manner and your pawn sac pays for itself? All you've shown are developing moves leading to nothing but you being down a pawn. Which makes sense because you fiancettod, so you were leading into a slow positional game until you threw the central pawn away.
Bro if you wanna play danish gambit play it
Gambitting a pawn in the opening makes sense in any of these cases:
- gaining an advantage in development,
- getting a dominance in the center.
- exposing the opponent's king.
Which of the above applies for your gambit?
Why is the name of this opening (BLUNDER) CREATED BY U called TIC TAC TOE gambit??
However, playing a random opening you have never played against might not make this as bad as one might think. Maybe if someone has not prepared against this they would play worse than normal. Look at the win rate, that will probably determine if the opening is good or not.
AlekhineEnthusiast46 wrote:
However, playing a random opening you have never played against might not make this as bad as one might think. Maybe if someone has not prepared against this they would play worse than normal. Look at the win rate, that will probably determine if the opening is good or not.
This AI-nonsense is just that, nonsense.
only one emoji would fit what I feel rn:🤮
Pretty solid opening in my opinion. Analysis doesn’t say the position is totally losing.