Playing against Nimzo-indian

Dear chesslovers,

I need some advice. I bought the book"starting out 1.d4" by John Cox. I don't like the recommendation by Cox against Nimzo-India. He recommends the kasparov variation Qc2. I do not like defending - I prefer to do all the attacking. If I have a choice between dynamic or defending to get the static advantages, I would choose dynamic.

I play Rubenstein variation against it but I don't have any materials on it. Can someone tell me more about Rubenstein, do I need a good book on it? I do play the modern treatment, Bd3 and Nge2. What are the pitfalls in that variation? Is the variation theory intensive?

 Is there any other variations against NI which do not require that I go out and buy a book (if I can find one)?

e4 has problems when the scilian nadjdorf variation is played it allows black real chances.

Fotoman,

Yes thats the variation. Black plays the hubner variation. Black hopes to double whites pawn and then use a bloackading strategy by d6.

EnGliSHCheSsPlAy,

 I think I will go and get a book on this variation. 

 killabeez,

thanks for the variation against scilian. I think I will stick to 1.d4 for now. too much investments and I quite enjoy it. 

 I concur with this.

i play 1.d4 nf6 2.c4 e6 3. e3

it confuses the hell outta them but then on move 4 u play 4. nc3 and if he pins it then u play ne2 so his pin is pointless and he looses a tempo