Refute the Englund gambit
4.Bd2 is the move I found
Black can equalize by taking back the pawn. White goes from +1.2 to +.2
4.Bd2 is the move I found
Black can equalize by taking back the pawn. White goes from +1.2 to +.2
I disagree.
I don’t think Black has equalized.
Also, your own statement doesn’t support your case that Black is Equal.
+ 0.20 would indicate White has Small Edge which I believe can be natured.
Welcome... to the "Beat the Englund Gambit like a red headed step child" party. lol
Been playing this variation for quite some time now, came across it years back... I'm a Center Counter Defense player. IMO... it's playing the Scandinavian/Center Counter defense as White with a move.
here is all the malarkey I usually encounter over at Lichess. (the main line is about the soundest line...
4.Bd2 is the move I found
Black can equalize by taking back the pawn. White goes from +1.2 to +.2
I disagree.
I don’t think Black has equalized.
Also, your own statement doesn’t support your case that Black is Equal.
+ 0.20 would indicate White has Small Edge which I believe can be natured.
Going from 1.2 to .2 is a mistake in my opinion. Going from .5 to .2 is an inaccuracy in the opening for white and already starting the losing/draw process. .2 (less than half a tempo) is not an advantage a human can even appreciate. Game above is 100% accuracy for white, those are the best moves bottom line.
Yes, the main trap to watch out for is 6.Bc3?? which is a disastrous (but reasonable looking) blunder.
White might as well resign here.
But as long as White remembers to avoid that (playing the knight to c3, instead) - he should be golden.
I admit to forgetting about this and auto-piloting the Bc3 blunder on a few occasions ... It's no fun to fall prey to a trap that you already know about - so be vigilant.