The only e4 defense I find doesn't have some major downside to it is the sicilian.
e4/e5 is too much about rote memorization. And white mostly chooses the variation.
The french is great but it's simply boring in many lines... though I will say there's not alot white can do to spice up the french. It's the best alternative to the sicilian but I couldn't play the french every game.
The Caro-Kann there are just too many chaotic attacks against it and it's all up to white what variation he wants to go into. Some people apparently find defending all of that fun but I will pass.
The nimzowitsch defense you end up in a bad hypermodern position and you should just play the modern. Or you get transposed right back into e4/e5.
The modern... well you have to play a hypermodern opening, it's not the kind of game most people find enjoyable.
The Pirc... is just worse than the modern, play the modern.
Alekhines... white has a simple formulaic way of dealing with it, it's just not that great at that point.
Scandinavian... can be fun but we all know it's dubious.
Sicilian is the only line with no downside... Luckily there are like 20 different sicilians you can play.
While the sicilian has alot of theory, there are also sidelines that'll allow you to bypass the theory, and you basically have control over which variation you want to play. But learning chess is a very long term commitment, don't expect quick results... taking shortcuts doesn't get you very far.
I’ve tried playing e5 and learning Andrew Toths Chessable course but it’s too much to learn on top of what I’m trying to learn for white e4.
Tried the scandi but I dont enjoy the positions I get into.
Examples of openings I like to play are Evans gambit, Smith Morra gambit, Hennig gambit.
I’m about a 1600 rated online player.