THE NEW BEST OPENING
Sort:
The Traxler? It hasn't been refuted yet and leads to very interesting, crazy games. Personally I would never use it but some people love it.
What about 4. g3 ?
this is a shit opening. there is a way beta 1 where u get da second night into play nd its checkmate in a couple of moves from there
Dec 4, 2007
0
#25
huh? according to the notation:
1.E4- E5
2.NF3- NC6
3. BC4- NC6
Please explain
The computer plays this move on me whenever I open up a game like black has. I've learned how to stop this attack the hard way. But, I will say that this was a well-thought form of attack(someone correct me if I'm wrong). But honestly, who in their right mind that is watching the board is going to bring up another knight when the kingside is going to be assaulted by the bishop/knight combo(provided they're not a newcomer)? My way to stop the attack before the knight gets that far is to go h2(playing from black's side). Anyone have any better ideas?
hahah this is the stupidest opening I've ever seen, is this a joke? an opening with a king in the middle of a chessboard? And why would a white king approach a black knight after a check... King moves back and thats it, your opening is done, whites end up with an extra piece and a far better position.
Blacks play is legitimate (the Wilkes-Barre, as noted above) ... the safest way for white to proceed goes a little like this:
5 Bxf7+ Kf8 or Ke7
6 Bd5
Here's a game where I played the white side of this, against an experienced practitioner of the opening:
http://www.chess.com/echess/game.html?id=1273781
Both sides play text for quite a few turns( 10 .... Bg4 is the first mistake, I think)..... whites first ten or eleven moves were plucked from Yuri Estrin's book "The Two Knights Defence".
fred at you age, i was playing street football. and you introducing new openings to the game of. i like your energy. not too novel though
There right its nothing new mate but well done with making it up with out book, at least your trying to be creative. Having said that its fairly easy to defend against it for a decent player, i would have 0-0 then chased your knight away then threaten to take pawn. Its normaly unwise to move a piece twice in the opening and if u study the masters games over the hundreds or years u would see why.....
therealgeorgemicheal wrote:
He claims its an awesome out, but he went for the Queen instead of going for an obvious Checkmate. I dont know if anyone else pointed this out, but here is what I see, starting with his number 5 move...
The board doesnt seem to be loading on mine... :-(
Here is what Ive got, starting at his Bxd5 move...
1. Bxd5 Qg4+ 2. Ke3 Qf4+ 3. Ke2 Bg4+ 4. Ke1 Qf2#
Mr_Wibbles wrote:
"You should listen to the criticism"
so here it is ... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that is pathetic , i would REALLY like to see you try that shit in a real game !!
" a great opening which sud be published I hope you like it and tell people Freddie Sugden is his name!
if you want more details on it then message me and i will tell u the main statistics and theorys behind it!" You cant even notate your "great opening that sud be published" " 1. E4, E5, NF3, NC6, BC4, NC6," maybe im just a begginer (highest rating of 1624 !!) but i didnt know there could be 2 knights on 1 square !!
please dude , keep your NEW BEST OPENING . because it is retarded. you probably spent a whole day thinkin it up and it was a day well wasted , there is no person on earth who would have that published. there are many ways to counter that even after the king has taken the bishop and you cant win the knight because it is still being protected by the bishop , so you have lost pieces . stick to knitting. and leave chess to the big boys...........
KrizProdigy wrote: Mr_Wibbles wrote:
"You should listen to the criticism"
so here it is ... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that is pathetic , i would REALLY like to see you try that shit in a real game !!
" a great opening which sud be published I hope you like it and tell people Freddie Sugden is his name!
if you want more details on it then message me and i will tell u the main statistics and theorys behind it!" You cant even notate your "great opening that sud be published" " 1. E4, E5, NF3, NC6, BC4, NC6," maybe im just a begginer (highest rating of 1624 !!) but i didnt know there could be 2 knights on 1 square !!
please dude , keep your NEW BEST OPENING . because it is retarded. you probably spent a whole day thinkin it up and it was a day well wasted , there is no person on earth who would have that published. there are many ways to counter that even after the king has taken the bishop and you cant win the knight because it is still being protected by the bishop , so you have lost pieces . stick to knitting. and leave chess to the big boys...........
This guy has not the first idea what he is talking about. The opening 1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Bc4 Nf6 4 Ng5 Bc5 is a real opening that has been published, talked about and played at the highest level many times. Its called the Wilkes-Barre or Traxler.
To take the pawn on f7 with the knight is extremely dangerous for white. Y. Estrin GM gives a whole chapter on this variation in his book "The Two Knight's Defence".
If Krizprodigy fancies the white pieces so much, perhaps he would like to try them against me in the position arising after 5 Nxf7? We could even publish the game afterwards!
When a Young player finds an interesting line, he should be encouraged, he may not know too much about oppenings, yet!, but we were all there once! some of these posts seem a bit harsh! I say well done youg man for finding the line!
thanks to some but i was only jokin when said it sud be published just interested to see what people thought and if it was thought of to be good
i agree that your opening is good because i try to use that move thn i won a game..........
fredster50 wrote: this is what I am talking about - Phobetor just admit it my beautiful openingYes I agree nice