Forums

Win with the Halloween Gambit!!!

Sort:
sndeww

bruh y u spamming this everywhere

RivertonKnight

I just thought it would be fun!

GM_Alphazer0

and white needs to deal with the pawns

HandsomeDesert
Once I played with my dad and I won because my dad played Qxg5?? And I played Qxe7#
But my dad has two more pawns
DalaiLuke

Is there a good resource to see how variations play out ... for example, the very smart GM knows hot to take advantage of various mistakes that black might make in their play.  But I don't have the foresight to appreciate on first glance these insights.  Is there a good source of why and how to play the "middle game" of this Halloween Gambit? 

ChessOfficial2016

The sacrifice on e5 in this gambit is a dangerous and attacking opening in bullet and blitz chess because black doesn't have time to think about it.

DalaiLuke

I've played this game in a decent level vote-chess match, and the black must be careful, the pitfalls are everywhere

sansuk

Hi guys, 16 years ago I wrote a booklet about the Halloween Gambit and it is time now to make a revision of it. I still believe it is playable and  I am now collecting all possible "refutations". So please publish them if you know some.  

 
sansuk

To start with, the "refutation" I met most on the forums is of Jan Pinski. Analysis shows he is not right :

Polish IM Jan Pinski claimed that the Halloween Gambit is refuted by these moves. He analyzed 9.Qxg7 Nxc3 10.Be3 Nd5+ 11.c3 Rf8 12.cxb4 Nxe3 13.fxe3 Qxb4+, concluding “Black is very close to winning”.

But with 9.Be3 White has a stronger move than 9.Qxg7 !

A)  9. .. O-O 10.Bd3 Nxc3 11.bxc3 (with a superior pawn structure for Black, but it is only temporary , Brause scored at 100 % by playing these moves) 11. .. Ba5 12.O-O Bb6 13.Qb4 Qxb4

(13...Re8 also possible, but this does not stop the exchange of Queens 14.Rae1 Qxb4 15.cxb4 Bxe3 16.Rxe3 Rxe3 17.cxb7 Bxb7 18.fxe3 )

14.cxb7 Bxb7 15.cxb4 ( the situation is equal )

B)  9...Nxc3!? may be a better alternative. We shall concentrate on 3 possibilities:

a) 10.bxc3 Bd6! 11.Qxg7 (11.cxb7?! Bxb7 12.Rb1 Be5 13.Qb4) 11...Be5- +;

b) 10.a3 Nd5+ 11.axb4 Nxe3 12.fxe3 dxc6 13.Qg7 Qxe3+ 14.Be2 Rf8 “ I don’t like White’s chances” Schiller ;

c) 10.Qxg7 ! Nd5+ 11.c3 Bxc3+ (11...Rf8!?) 12.bxc3 Rf8  13.cxd7+ Bxd7 14.Qg5 Qxg5 15.Bxg5 Nxc3 16.Bd3 Analysis Torrecillas-Schiller ]

C)  Black can also play 9. .. f5 but this also leads to equality : 9...f5 10.Bd3

a)10. .. Bxc3+ 11.bxc3 dxc6 12.O-O Be6 13.Rfe1 O-O 14.Bf4 Rfe8 15.Bxe4 fxe4 16.Rxe4)

b) 10. .. dxc6 11.Bxe4 fxe4 12.a3 Bd6 13.Qxe4 Be6 14.O-O-O O-O 15.Rhe1

c) 10. .. Bc5 ch leads to a draw in Torrecillas-Maciaga,HGT1, 2003,½-½(16) as well as in Wind- Torrecillas, HGT1, 2003,½-½(23). Both games continue 11.Qc4 Bxe3 12.Bxe4 Bxf2+ (12. ..Bb6? 13.0-0-0 fxe4 14.Rhe1 or 12. .. Bh6? 13.0-0 fxe4 14.Rfe1, both with strong attack) 13.Kxf2 fxe4

 

 

 
Sack_o_Potatoes
fryedk wrote:

This game happened on the board next to me in a tournament. The loser, (much higher rated) was visibly upset after the game. Quite brilliant play by white, who absolutely dominated his opponent. 



I was wondering Ohhhh that's the holloween gambit

kubek_87

https://youtube.com/c/Szachyb%C5%82yskawicznezKubkiem

Checkout my YT channel with more and more Halloween games 😉🎃🎃🎃🎃

 

sansuk
pfren schreef:
sansuk wrote:

Hi guys, 16 years ago I wrote a booklet about the Halloween Gambit and it is time now to make a revision of it. I still believe it is playable and  I am now collecting all possible "refutations". So please publish them if you know some.  

 

You may show if you have any sort of half-decent line against what is regarded currently as the refutation of the gambit.

 

 

 

Black is threatening to consolidate with ...d5, so only 8.Qe2 and 8.Qf3 make some sense- but both are clearly inadequate if you analyse them.



 
sansuk

Sansuk (2084) - Robertgold (1932), GK 11/3/2022

 
sansuk

White does not have to play 7.Bc4, there is also the option 7.h4

 

 

Sansuk ( 2038) -  peteywheaty420 (1911), GK 19/03/2022

 
sansuk

Why not ?  Because Black was not Stockfish. He is a human and can make mistakes if constantly being under pressure. I do agree the Halloween is unsound. But there are big practical chances for White because he gives the opponent the opportunity to go wrong again and again.

As long as I am playing chess, I could never beat an adversary 200 points higher than me. But when I discovered the Halloween I could, I even won a correspondence game against a FM who had 400 ELO more.  There is no other opening in which this had been possible.

I always loose the postmortem analyses but I often win the games. What is more important , finding the truth or winning ?

 
Steven-ODonoghue
sansuk wrote:

As long as I am playing chess, I could never beat an adversary 200 points higher than me.

You have a ~24% expected score against a player rated 200 points above you. That's a mathematical fact, regardless of if you are playing the Halloween or not.

sansuk

24 % score can be 48 % draws and 52 % losses.

With aggresive attacking play it can be 24 % wins and 76 % losses.

 
kubek_87

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZLISehYN_U&list=PLSqqqkIhZAIaRvdA9mj6rv3kr8dqrlEJD&ab_channel=Szachyb%C5%82yskawicznezKubkiem

My YT channel with Halloween playlists wink.png check it out wink.png

sansuk
pfren schreef:

 

You may show if you have any sort of half-decent line against what is regarded currently as the refutation of the gambit.

 

 

 

Black is threatening to consolidate with ...d5, so only 8.Qe2 and 8.Qf3 make some sense- but both are clearly inadequate if you analyse them.



This is a game between two computers , both rated more than 3000, on the Computer Chess Championship 2019

 
DalaiLuke

pfren ... maybe eat a snickers or just enjoy a novel opening for it's aggressiveness.  Sansuk is respectfully answering your questions and providing examples, yet your replies digress into something less.