Negative 445
Average rating of a twelve year old boy...
Do you play differently, to take advantage of some particular weakness or avoid some particular strength of players that age?
Do you play differently, to take advantage of some particular weakness or avoid some particular strength of players that age?
Indeed my strategy is a little different, especially if this is OTB. They often have average playing strength above what their rating is, but they have a certain weakness. May it be defending under pressure, or having trouble converting a material advantage. I've had wins where even though I may be a pawn down, the position is rather awkward for both sides and the materially advantageous side doesn't really feel like it is up a pawn.
Deviating from a main line in the opening may also catch one of them off guard; I've pulled some rather unethical opening strikes in state scholastic championships.
Another thing that should be considered is that cost-benefit analysis is something that only older people do. Younger players (just like how I played 5 or so years ago) may only look at the pros to a certain move or strategy and disregard any possible cons.
Also, don't resign as you would against a patient adult. I'm not kidding when I say that against a nine year old 1600 uscf rated player I was down a queen for a knight after an opening calamity, and still won after setting 3 traps and my opponent fell for all of them out of impatience.
(I may have forgotten a ton since the last time I played an otb chess tournament was 2 years ago. I'm certainly not at 1800+ strength anymore.)
I'm 10 years old and my rating is 800. So, I I'll be 12, I'll be 1000. Am I right?
Shouldn't be that slow. You will be around 1300-1400 I guess
There are 9449 rated players of 12 years or younger.
The highest rated is 2407.
https://ratings.fide.com/
Oh yea and I'm 8 and I'm 812 or something in rapid and 507 in Blitz. Is that good??????