Kasparov G.
Anand V.
Anatoly Karpov
Capablanca
Bobby F.
Rolf Harris
Tommy Cooper
Benny Hill
Spike Milligan
and of course Oliver Hardy.
Another worthless quest.
Rolf Harris
Tommy Cooper
Benny Hill
Spike Milligan
and of course Oliver Hardy.
Another worthless quest.
Not famous people you jerk
Now I'm thinking about Spassky because Fischer a tough time beating Spassky.
Who agree's?
If Fischer is good, shouldn't Spassky be in the Top 5 Players of All Time?
By the way, Fischer only beat Spassky once in his life and that was when he
earned the World Champion Title.
1.Capablanca
2.Fischer
3.Kasparov
4.Alekhine
5. Morhpy
Karpov and Lasker would make a top 7 in my book.
Fischer did have it tough against spassky,but that does not make spassky better.
Some of the greats have had players they did not do well against.
But it is how you do against everyone that counts.
Hmm... difficult... In terms of absolute playing strength (developments in theory over time not taken into account), I'd probably say:
1. Kasparov
2. Capablanca
3. Fischer
4. Karpov
5. Alekhine
6. Botvinnik
7. Tal
8. Keres
9. Korchnoi
10. Nimzowitsch
Though when compared to their contemporaries, it'd probably be different:
1. Morphy
2. Capablanca
3. Fischer
4. Kasparov
5. Steinitz
Or consider the influence they've had on the game as a whole rather than their own playing strength:
1. Steinitz for founding modern chess
2. Nimzowitsch for pioneering positional chess, especially in his book My System (still being read today)
3. Tarrasch for stipulating the classic opening principles
4. Réti for founding the hypermodern school of chess and proving its viability
5. Kasparov for popularising dynamic positional play (such as pawn sacs in the middlegame)
6. Fischer for his groundbreaking opening novelties
One could include Philidor in the above list for noting that "pawns are the soul of chess" in a time when chess was all about crazy tactics and sacrificing material, but his influence on modern chess is negligible.
Kasparov, Fischer, Karpov, Botvinnik, Tal.