Guys yes it might have been a queen take for rook but it's not any different from a regular brilliant. It's not even astounding you could expect that from most people
did chess.com add a "genius move"???😲😲
Sort:
asto0239 wrote:
sharpdon3 wrote:
I analysed the position no genius
HOW DID YOU ANALYZE
In Analysis??
nnnn
hi im emir from iran
im graphic designer
Sup
I’m Kliment future chess grand master
no
same OoH... I jUsT GoTs A GeNiUs mOvE
.
And the fact that it says 'Qxf7 is genius' and not 'Qxf7 is A genius MOVE (as it usually is) '... It's probably a fake. Right???
OmG I goT a GENIUS MOVE!!!!!!!!111!1!1!1!1!!!1!1!1!!1!1!1!1!1!!1!!!1!!1!1!€!€{29€91{>9{¥>¥39¥]~<_8]…<8_[…<73_[<…[73_<… it totally converted into 2000 brilliant moves!!!
Fake
Can’t see the image, also hi @KeSetoKaiba
asto0239 wrote:
sharpdon3 wrote:
I analysed the position no genius
HOW DID YOU ANALYZE
using an analysis board
If you look closely, you can see that there is more space at the bottom of the circle. That is, because he alligned the box surrounding the text to the middle of the circle when photoshoping the image. But the ! Is a bit lifted of the ground compared to other letters: I! . That is why its missaligned.
I wish
I analysed the position no genius
HOW DID YOU ANALYZE