king vs king
no, that's bishop mates king,
If you're using the logic of the king is blocking the escape then it could also be called king's own pawn mates it's king
No. The king moved, theregore the king delievered checkmste
Weird question, i just a saw 'Killer king' in someone's award, maybe by discovered mate with a king move or idk
Kings orders his fellow soldiers to fight, as a last stand/hope, the king fights with the king. A king is a good and wise leader and is so trained to the point another king cannot corner him. Two kings fighting is unreal, one king must retreat, so In chess, the two kings, one white and one black knows how to fight and retreat, the moment the king is in contact with another king, they both retreat knowing fighting with two kings will end in a draw, and we don't want a draw right? A king alone is grasping to draw and another king has his armies and that king wants to win. When two are alone, it ends with a draw, or an agreement. There is no such thing in chess as "As a king alone I shall bring you down with me."
Now let's talk about different types of draws.
Draw by agreement - A king agrees to another king that the war shall end.
Draw by the 50 move rule - A king with his armies became tired of chasing the lone king.
Draw by insufficient material - Two kings have their armies both died so they both retreat/agree to stop the war.
Draw by repetition - Both armies of kings/kings itself repeat moves 3 time in a row.
With these information, we can all agree that the kings alone don't want to fight without their armies.
King vs King alone have limits/boundaries.
Another thing is the kings want to recover and build their empire and armies again and don't want to give out the tressures to the other king so with this mindset, the two kings don't want to win by himselves.