Because thats not true.
How long did it take you to get an elo of 1000 in chess.
WHAT DOES ANYBODY NEED ELO RATING FOR?
A fair question, and one that can be answered by anyone who has ever run a tournament or has been certified as a tournament director (TD).
Ratings are needed by TDs to be able to run tournaments. Before pairings can be made, the players need to be put in order from highest to lowest. So, say you have 20 people in a Swiss System tournament. You rank them according to ratings from 1-20. You cut the list in half and player 1 plays number 11; 2 plays 12; 3 plays 13 etc... Round 2 is paired by score groups: one point, half point and zero point. These groups are also put in rating order and the same process goes on... This is only possible if a standard rating system, based on player results from previous tournaments, exists. The rating system we have is called "Elo," because it was named for Arpad Elo, the physicist who applied the science of statistics to the development of chess ratings.
So, you don't need a rating unless you want to participate in tournaments. It can be used as a substitute metric for seeing if you are making progress as a chess player, since it is result-based. The more you win, the higher you go. People then judge themselves based on their rating instead of on their basic playing skills, which, if improved, will go up over time.
Took me almost 2 years glad I wasted my time bc I'm still gonna get made fun of for having a crappy elo
9 months
i used to play my old account and it took me 9 months then i made a new account
Ha, a 1000 talking... No offense. But you shouldn't be teaching...