Forums

What is considered a beginner rating?

Sort:
Ziryab
1_a31-0 wrote:

Anyone know if there are canadian titles (not that i'll get one, but still)

 

There are.

https://chess.ca/node/832

st0ckfish

u can check his profile

st0ckfish
Ziryab wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:

Anyone know if there are canadian titles (not that i'll get one, but still)

 

There are.

https://chess.ca/node/832

Thanks! happy.png And can u verify these titles on chesscom?

Ziryab
KibiDangoman wrote:

Bro I just click on your picture it says 2245 rating.

I know that must been really hard because I barely managed to make 2200.

How many games have you played bro?

 

That is my correspondence rating. You cannot compare it to blitz and bullet. My blitz rating is low, and my bullet really low.

I have beat several NMs in blitz the past few weeks, but that doesn't make me an NM.

Ziryab
1_a31-0 wrote:
Ziryab wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:

Anyone know if there are canadian titles (not that i'll get one, but still)

 

There are.

https://chess.ca/node/832

Thanks!  And can u verify these titles on chesscom?

 

I assume that if you have a Canadian NM title, the website can verify it and extend free premium membership to you.

kindaspongey
Ziryab wrote:

… If you play in a USCF tournament and have a national rating from another country (or FIDE), the tournament director might look at that rating and use it for pairing purposes. ...

Does that sort of thing influence the initial provisional rating?

st0ckfish
Ziryab wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:
Ziryab wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:

Anyone know if there are canadian titles (not that i'll get one, but still)

 

There are.

https://chess.ca/node/832

Thanks!  And can u verify these titles on chesscom?

 

I assume that if you have a Canadian NM title, the website can verify it and extend free premium membership to you.

I don't but still xD

Ziryab
kindaspongey wrote:
Ziryab wrote:

… If you play in a USCF tournament and have a national rating from another country (or FIDE), the tournament director might look at that rating and use it for pairing purposes. I did that with a family of children from New Zealand who played in several scholastic tournaments a few years ago, although these events were not USCF rated either. They were rated with a scholastic rating that we use in the Pacific Northwest (mostly Washington and Oregon).

Does that sort of thing influence the initial provisional rating?

 

Not directly, but strength of competition can influence the initial provisional rating.

An unrated player paired at the top or middle of the pool might face stronger opponents than one paired at the bottom. Tournament performance will matter more. Assuming a strong performance, however, a higher pairing will usually lead to stronger opponents.

Marie-AnneLiz
kindaspongey a écrit :
Ziryab wrote:

… If you play in a USCF tournament and have a national rating from another country (or FIDE), the tournament director might look at that rating and use it for pairing purposes. ...

Does that sort of thing influence the initial provisional rating?

I know a GM and he started with a low provisional rating.

He is still now 2059 for 30 min games.

kindaspongey
Marie-AnneLiz wrote:
kindaspongey a écrit :
Ziryab wrote:

… If you play in a USCF tournament and have a national rating from another country (or FIDE), the tournament director might look at that rating and use it for pairing purposes. ...

Does that sort of thing influence the initial provisional rating?

I know a GM and he started with a low provisional rating.

He is still now 2059 for 30 min games.

I was wondering about the provisional USCF rating.

Marie-AnneLiz
kindaspongey a écrit :

I was wondering about the provisional USCF rating.

Good question! I understand!

kindaspongey
KibiDangoman wrote:
Ziryab wrote:

That is my correspondence rating. You cannot compare it to blitz and bullet. My blitz rating is low, and my bullet really low. ...

Ah ok so correspondence means like USCF official stuff? So then why dont you have a title like that list shows from before? ...

If I am understanding correctly, you were looking at the Ziryab chess.com Daily rating (often informally referred to as a correspondence rating). It is not a USCF rating, although, at least at one time, USCF had its own correspondence rating system.

Ziryab
KibiDangoman wrote:
Ziryab wrote:

That is my correspondence rating. You cannot compare it to blitz and bullet. My blitz rating is low, and my bullet really low.
I have beat several NMs in blitz the past few weeks, but that doesn't make me an NM.

Ah ok so correspondence means like USCF official stuff? So then why dont you have a title like that list shows from before?

I beat a couple NM too but my rating didnt get higher than playing normal people.

You said I dont have many games but I played like 1000 games bro?

 

That is my correspondence rating on this site. It means nothing anywhere else. It is also inflated because I routinely report suspected cheaters and employ the Dead Man Defense when a ban appears imminent.

Unfortunately, chess.com refuses to use the term “correspondence” for correspondence chess. They call it “Daily” and used another term earlier in the site’s history. The time controls and rules of play (books and databases permitted) are from a long history of correspondence chess that goes back to the days of move transmission via smoke signals, followed by several forms of mail, including email (which is now the norm for USCF correspondence).

The ICCF (International Correspondence Chess Federation) uses online move transmission like this website, but the rules differ on a critical point: they maintain no pretence of preventing engine use.

Ziryab
kindaspongey wrote:
KibiDangoman wrote:
Ziryab wrote:

That is my correspondence rating. You cannot compare it to blitz and bullet. My blitz rating is low, and my bullet really low. ...

Ah ok so correspondence means like USCF official stuff? So then why dont you have a title like that list shows from before? ...

If I am understanding correctly, you were looking at the Ziryab chess.com Daily rating (often informally referred to as a correspondence rating). It is not a USCF rating, although, at least at one time, USCF had its own correspondence rating system.

 

My USCF correspondence rating is still provisional, based on 24 games. I last played USCF correspondence about twenty years ago. I’ve been playing correspondence on sites like chess.com since 2003, but basically quit two years ago. I’ve played three games since.

PatzerGambitt

Everything under 2850 is actually really bad. 

Marie-AnneLiz
PatzerGambitt a écrit :

Everything under 2850 is actually really bad. 

Anyone under 6 foot 4 and 240 pounds of hard muscles is actually pretty bad wink.png

Marie-AnneLiz
KibiDangoman a écrit :
Marie-AnneLiz wrote:
PatzerGambitt a écrit :

Everything under 2850 is actually really bad. 

Anyone under 6 foot 4 and 240 pounds of hard muscles is actually pretty bad

Yeah but people cant change their height. Also weight/muscles is hard to control.

Upping chess rating is much easier so thats a bad example.

You missed my point.

He said 2850!

 

PatzerGambitt
Marie-AnneLiz escreveu:
PatzerGambitt a écrit :

Everything under 2850 is actually really bad. 

Anyone under 6 foot 4 and 240 pounds of hard muscles is actually pretty bad

hi kitten, 

do u come here often?

think i'm in luv 

Marie-AnneLiz
KibiDangoman a écrit :
Marie-AnneLiz wrote:

You missed my point.

He said 2850!

So? Thats not even so special on chess.com there are many people with this rating and much higher too.

Maybe he is a very strong player? My goal is 2450 by the end of Feburary but 2800 thats crazy. Maybe in a couple months?

Sorry for the misunderstanding;i always think in ELO or USFC rating.

Marie-AnneLiz
KibiDangoman a écrit :

Ah ok thats tournaments and stuff. So Magnus is close to 3000 right? Ok there it makes no sense because we are all prolly 500 rated in that scenario lol.

Yes here are the top 3:

1  Nakamura, Hikaru  g  USA  2900  23  1987
 2  Carlsen, Magnus  g  NOR  2887  31  1990
 3  Vachier-Lagrave, Maxime  g  FRA  2822  29  1990