AWARDCHESS IMMORTAL CHESS BLOGS!? hEH?

I agree diskamyl.  AWARDCHESS: it would help us if you made a little more sense.

Are you saying that typing in bold font is something to report someone of abuse? who is he abusing? you?  This is the herart of the issue.  It is the victim complining about his "abuser" yet he keeps running to him, just so he can complain about him again.  If you see awardchess by a forum topic, just do not click it.  Chess.com allows users to just BOLD, Italics, and the like to add expression to non-personal black 12 font letters.  Is this seriously someworth worth reporting abuse?  (If someone told me a perosn was doing this online I would seriously laugh, reporting abuse for using colors...  seems juvenile to report this at the least :)

And then you said you hated this person.  Such a strong feeling for such a truly pathetic reason?  wouldn't you say?

by diskamyl
International 

Member Points: 101"...comparing himself with Pushkin and Gogol!"

Am I really did it?? It is so good, that I didn't make mention of Lenin! And Socrates...

I became a premium member of Chess.com in good faith although there are more than several other chess venues on-line that I might have chosen.

I have seen in other threads on this site content with sexually inappropriate references to women, jokes about human private body functions, visited one homepage with an album  of photographs containing content bordering on child pornography, and seen many dubious postings that would not be allowed on a family-friendly website. At first I was really shocked by some of the content tolerated on this site. However, I have not honored threads or content I do not like by posting or personally interacting with them. Having found problematic content here as well as much that is genuinely valuable, I do not waste my time by engaging persons or content that I find distasteful.

There is no logical reason why those who do not share my appreciation for the AWARDCHESS Group Tournament Director’s postings should feel compelled to insult and  harass him. Our AWARDCHESS TD's posts contain nothing that any rational person would consider offensive.

Do you find everything offensive to you just because you lack an experiential frame of reference for the understanding of it? If you read the NY Daily News because your reading level is fifth-grade, should the New York Times be banned because it requires an 11th-grade reading ability and this "offends you"?

Our AWARDCHESS activities on this site are in accord with Chess.com guidelines and serve its ostensible purposes, yet AWARDCHESS is subject ongoingly to abuse and threats of  sanction. The vindictive harassment and stalking of our Tournament Director in this thread in particular are entirely unwarranted and malicious.

You are well aware that old forum threads only scroll down off the page when new threads are added. New posts and new threads push the inactive threads into the archive. If you do not like to see the AWARDCHESS threads that are no longer active, all you have to do is to create your own new threads. Why does this offend you? Your complaint that our AWARDCHESS is still creating too many new threads is disingenuous.

If you do not understand us, if you do not like us, even if, as we have been told, you “hate” our AWARDCHESS Group's TD, please do not disturb yourselves and others by monitoring our threads to disrupt them. Those who find our very existence to be offensive should simply go about their own business on Chess.com, just as we in the AWARDCHESS Group and our TD go about ours without concerning ourselves about or interfering in others’ activities.

Well, I do have to say you have succeeding in creating a very annoying thread.  I'm not sure that it is the most annoying thread ever, but I'm sure it is a close second.  Now that I understand it has been created soley to annoy people, I actually enjoy taking part in it.   And I don't see why I, as a contributer to this forum, can't take part in annoying others as well, even if they should be AWARDCHESS.  I got to say that knowing what this forum is all about has given me peace of mind, however I still don't understand why one would want to create such a blog.  Whatever the reason, it has nothing to do directly with chess.

Speaking for most of us who don't understand AWARDCHESS, I don't think we really hate AWARDCHESS.  Its pretty difficult to hate someone who never harmed you in any way.  People tend to overuse the word "hate".  What they are trying to say is they hate your posts.

Speaking for myself, I like you, AWARDCHESS.  You are extremely creative and prolific, although you take criticism too personally.  In my posts, I didn't mean to attack you as a person.  I was merely analyzing your posts.  As an author, you have got to realize that submitting literature to the general public will always produce critics, good and bad.  Use their criticism advantagously to back up your ideas by refuting it or to by accepting it, making yourself stronger as a person either way.  Do not take it personally because it probably wasn't intended that way and people will see your ideas as weak.

I don't hate AWARDCHESS.  I am simply annoyed by his meaninglessness.

By that I meant your meaningless posts, not you.  Didn't my last post make that clear?  Didn't I just say you were taking things too personally?

if you think they are meaningless you have obviously missed the point :)

If I did miss his point then I am sure I'm not the only one.

Ok, ok, if you really want to push it I'll go -1 for -4.   Lets see...

71 div 4 = 17

71 mod 4 =3

1322 - 17 = 1305

yeah, ok, I can do that.

I wish you sleep well!??

(1305) ^ (1/2) ~ 36.

Munchies wrote:

AWARDCHESS BLOG IMMORTAL LIKE BAD BEER FARTS THAT WAKE UP THE DOG.

Don't you mean the neighbor's dog?

8º commandement - Thou shall shut up