Forums

Challenge: Why is this position illegal?

Sort:
KieferSmith
Arisktotle
fjdkslagh wrote:
Optimissed wrote:

From what I understand, that's an impossible position and impossible positions don't count as illegal.

However, in this case the B could have taken a piece.

impossible and illegal mean the same thing you frozen toilet seat.

Even math protects us. A legal position in chess is a possible world in math. An illegal position is an impossible world. However, a pink elephant is neither legal nor illegal as it is outside the chess language space, it is not a chess position at all. Interestingly the BBC broadcasts a TV show based on the same concepts and named: "IMPOSSIBLE".

KieferSmith
bald55

The positions are illegal because I said so

Arisktotle
KieferSmith wrote in #52:
 

Illegal positions are only interesting when they narrowly crossed the line such that precise analysis in needed. This one is way out of sight!

dengeth

#1 too much pawns even if promoted: 9

MARattigan

#43 6 dark squared white bishops, 5 of which must have promoted by capturing, but only 3 black men missing.

MARattigan

#41 white rook, knight and lisght squared bishop must be promotions but only two whie pawns missing.