AI analysis of all my games?

And if you want to quote the case of Alphazero, it's yes a self learning/teaching chess engine. Still just an engine. Can't give news from family and friends, just play chess. Of course, one could combine it with an AI, but that would still be two softwares working together.

ChatGPT, for an example, and unless it has been enhanced since last time I've heard of it, will tell you it can play chess, not even knowing it's a lie. Because ChatGPT has no chess engine to use, and is, therefore, unable to play chess properly.

ChatGPT will go pick moves and comments to the moves, in pre-existing texts from digitalized chess books and chess magazines, which will produce soon tons of illegal moves and inadequate comments. It's "doing conversation", not playing chess.

It doesn't even know what chess is, it doesn't even know it's currently "playing a game". It doesn't know what means "playing", it doesn't know what a game is.

Would you combine ChatGPT with a chess engine, ChatGPT would have a say about when to start the chess engine, and if it starts the chess engine. But even if talking to you during the game, it would still not take part in the chess calculations, and would have not a clue about what is going on in the game.

Etc. Etc. Etc.

AI is a thing, chess engine is an other, "chess AI" doesn't exist.

Then you may have a chess engine augmented with a conversational AI. Still, two distinct and separated programms, one not knowing what the other is doing.

So, in conclusion: if it happens you see an AI playing strong, impressive chess, it's because that AI uses a strong chess engine, that would be just as strong without the AI. Hence, the strenght of the chess play would have nothing to do with the "intelligence" of the AI. The AI is just having a good tool, you could use without the help of the AI.

This forum is awful.

You’re not a good person. Listen to the way you talk to people.

just so you know, I work in azure OpenAI studio creating ai solutions for healthcare employees numbering about 50,000.

And you're sure making the coffee, not coding any AI.

As for if I'm a good person or not, that's off topic.

You know what? F off. You’re a waste of skin.

Boo hoo I ruined your illusions. I may add mankind won't settle on Mars, and is not close at all from any interstellar travel. Other fairy tales I can ruin for your own good?

This worked for me to improve openings. I borrowed the text and image from someone elses post on another site.

When you learn new openings and in general for improving your opening repertoire, try AiChessCoach .net. It is free to use, takes 60 seconds and gets you top quality feedback (as a pdf) on your opening repertoire based on analysis of the 200 most recent games you have played online. Works with both lichess and chess .com. With this you get a book that is customized only for you.

If you are repeating the same mistakes it will show you where and give suggestions for improvements. It will tell you at what positions you deviate from what top level players played at the same positions as you have played (and your score from that position). It does not necessarily mean that you played a mistake. But it could mean that you have something to learn from what the masters played (from the same positions as you have played). It gives you an opportunity to learn from the very best players.

The green arrows are the winning moves +2400 players played from the same position and the moves below each position is an example of a mainline. The moves above each position are simply the moves leading to the position that you get feedback on.

Also it helps to do lots of tactics exercises, either at lichess or chess .com.

Good luck!

Hi, chess.com has this via aimchess.com which i believe they own.