What a catastrophe! It was as if his Knight was as good as your queen! Thanks for posting, you can obviously see the funny side and we can all learn a lesson about complacency.
What a catastrophe! It was as if his Knight was as good as your queen! Thanks for posting, you can obviously see the funny side and we can all learn a lesson about complacency.
One thing you can do when you are waaay ahead on material (like a queen and 3 pawns in your game) is to think "what is my opponent's only hope" and then take that away from him. Since trading the queen for two rooks at move 26 still leaves you way ahead and also takes away his only hope, it's a good practical move.
One reason for the downfall in this game is that your rooks never got active. In essence, you were playing 2 pieces (Q and N) against 3 pieces (2R and N).
Ouch... Yeah move 25 was where you could have sealed the deal. 25.Qxd8 ...Nxd8 26. Nxg6 ... black resigns.
That was a really ugly game from both sides. You had several oppurtunities to take of his rook with your knight..why didn't you use them?
Your opponent could've also takes the pawn quite a few moves back and won..
The biggest mistake here was that I started winning and stopped thinking.