scooby7777 wrote:
your cheating
I’m not tho, I think this is a joke bc ur bio says if you win your a cheater
Is 90 accuracy normal?
Sort:
Jan 7, 2023
0
#23
What is a normal accuracy. I do normally get 90% nor do any of my opponents. What is usual for a say 800 blitz player
scogan wrote:
What is a normal accuracy. I do normally get 90% nor do any of my opponents. What is usual for a say 800 blitz player
Probably like 65-75% possibly 80
Jan 8, 2023
0
#25
I typed incorrectly. I should have said I do not normally get 90 percent In my blitz games I normally get between 70% and 85% I do get 60s and I have gotten as high as 95% even on longer games although its rare and it depends on if my opponent makes mistake where it is obvious what my move should be. A good example if you are see a mate in 3 or you start pushing opponents king to a square to deliver checkmate by rook or Queen and your king. Some times those take 7 8 moves where this helps your accuracy.
scogan wrote:
I typed incorrectly. I should have said I do not normally get 90 percent In my blitz games I normally get between 70% and 85% I do get 60s and I have gotten as high as 95% even on longer games although its rare and it depends on if my opponent makes mistake where it is obvious what my move should be. A good example if you are see a mate in 3 or you start pushing opponents king to a square to deliver checkmate by rook or Queen and your king. Some times those take 7 8 moves where this helps your accuracy.
Thats very normal for your rating, dw about it
Jan 9, 2023
0
#27
x-0460907528 wrote:
Duckfest wrote:
Your question has been answered (good post by KeSetoKaiba) so I'll just add some thoughts
First of all, 90-95% is not that high. It's an impressive score, especially at your rating, but won't raise alarms. In simple terms, accuracy reflects your play as compared to perfect play. I saw a recent game where you got a 91% score. In 32 moves (book moves don't count) you played 19 Best moves, with 6 excellent moves, 2 good, 3 blunders and 2 missed wins. You won't be mistaken for an engine or bot. Overall, your sub optimal moves where close enough to the best move to get a high rating.
Though 90%+ accuracy is impressive for a 600-700 player, it's is easy to score high against a 600-700 player. Because positions usually have obvious best moves. When your opponent makes mistakes, you get an easy best move.
I occasionally score around the 97, 98 or even 99% mark. Yet, no one will find it suspicious. Personally, I consider these my 'perfect' games. Opportunity presented itself and I took it. But to a higher rated player none of my moves would appear exceptional.
hi duckfest. you sound like you have a pretty good grasp of this issue so i would like to ask you a question. i am rated in the 1200s in daily and was playing someone rated a bit below me. in a 31 move game he had 26 best moves, 1 excellent move, 1 good move, and 3 book moves. do you think that is a bit unusua?
pretty usual its average
i want to report Escort_me as he has a 95 percent accuracy in my previous match with an elo of 800 an he doesnt play like that before so please ban him because hes using a bot to win because everytime i see a cheater its around 94-100 so i find him suspicious so please watch the game ty (the accuracy isnt consistent with the 90-95 range in the last 5 matches)
FritzXD wrote:
i want to report Escort_me as he has a 95 percent accuracy in my previous match with an elo of 800 an he doesnt play like that before so please ban him because hes using a bot to win because everytime i see a cheater its around 94-100 so i find him suspicious so please watch the game ty (the accuracy isnt consistent with the 90-95 range in the last 5 matches)
First of all, your post against the rules.
Second, your claim is also complete nonsense. In that game your opponent had a lot of blunders, including not winning your queen (move 15) and missing a totally obvious mate-in-2 (move 27).
See here:
https://www.chess.com/game/live/71669633785?username=fritzxd
I’ve gotten 0 blunders 0 mistakes and a few inaccuracies on some matches, sometimes you just play better than normal, but I usually have 70-80 accuracy with one blunder that ruins it entirely but 70% of the time they miss it and I go on to win the fame
Game*
Mar 7, 2023
0
#32
Flappy_Box wrote:
Recently I've been analysing my games and I have around 90-95 accuracy, is this normal? is it a bug? will I get banned?
Bro I checked your profil and your average accuracy is 68%
Don't lie to yourself. Anyways, I am 1800 and for me getting more than 90 accuracy means I played a great game especially if the person/bot was high rated (1500 or more).
Mar 7, 2023
0
#33
TheNewCountryLigondeez wrote:
scogan wrote:
What is a normal accuracy. I do normally get 90% nor do any of my opponents. What is usual for a say 800 blitz player
Probably like 65-75% possibly 80
For Blitz and for your rating it means you have potential (1200) but maybe you were like 800 because it looks like others say you're 800 so ig it's just rly impressive. I expect many players of your rating to blunder their queen early on in 3 minute games...
Hi! This is Darren. I am a college student currently developing a new mobile chess game using NFT and blockchain technology. Would love to hear about your thought! It would be much appreciated if you can help me complete this survey. The link is : https://forms.gle/WV22JPPhUwP3pvyh6. Also, Would you like to participate in a 20min short interview with us? We will give out a $10 gift card after.
Duckfest wrote:
Your question has been answered (good post by KeSetoKaiba) so I'll just add some thoughts
First of all, 90-95% is not that high. It's an impressive score, especially at your rating, but won't raise alarms. In simple terms, accuracy reflects your play as compared to perfect play. I saw a recent game where you got a 91% score. In 32 moves (book moves don't count) you played 19 Best moves, with 6 excellent moves, 2 good, 3 blunders and 2 missed wins. You won't be mistaken for an engine or bot. Overall, your sub optimal moves where close enough to the best move to get a high rating.
Though 90%+ accuracy is impressive for a 600-700 player, it's is easy to score high against a 600-700 player. Because positions usually have obvious best moves. When your opponent makes mistakes, you get an easy best move.
I occasionally score around the 97, 98 or even 99% mark. Yet, no one will find it suspicious. Personally, I consider these my 'perfect' games. Opportunity presented itself and I took it. But to a higher rated player none of my moves would appear exceptional.
Mar 8, 2023
0
#36
darrenyeah1 wrote:
Hi! This is Darren. I am a college student currently developing a new mobile chess game using NFT and blockchain technology. Would love to hear about your thought! It would be much appreciated if you can help me complete this survey. The link is : https://forms.gle/WV22JPPhUwP3pvyh6. Also, Would you like to participate in a 20min short interview with us? We will give out a $10 gift card after.
yeah pls choose me
I am a 600 rapid player and i average 70 to 90. So am i considered an intermediate or advanced player? And should i create another account since my current account's elo is not matching my accuracy.
Mar 30, 2023
0
#38
90% is already very good, especially on average, not sure it is possible. Sometimes over 90 is possible but very rare, or your opponent helps somehow and you play very well. Possible not every game
trimalo wrote:
90% is already very good, especially on average, not sure it is possible. Sometimes over 90 is possible but very rare, or your opponent helps somehow and you play very well. Possible not every game
I dont average 90+ just in the 70% to 90% range
your cheating