Forums

Is 90 accuracy normal?

Sort:
sv027

90 is best

AbyssGnasher

how do you hit 100% accuracy? I never understood that

GMANVI2400

90 means 2 things either that you are playing with a noob or you are really good

GMANVI2400
Flappy_Box wrote:

Recently I've been analysing my games and I have around 90-95 accuracy, is this normal? is it a bug? will I get banned?

nooooooo bro you're just goooooooooood

arosbishop

Play against higher rated players and it will adjust to reality. Stronger opposition makes you better.

Emi47_3

is it normal to get 90+ im 1300.

Jake2016s
It depends on your opponent’s play style if your play style can counter your opponent’s play style you get about 90-95 accuracy in your match against the opponent.
Mul345
AbyssGnasher wrote:

how do you hit 100% accuracy? I never understood that

Ive done it on lichess

Mul345
DavidMa123 wrote:

90+ accuracy is not even common among 2200 rated players, they often at least get 83 accuracy every game. THeir games often last until endgame. I actually once got a 96.6 accuracy with 2 brilliant moves in a ROW against the 2500 danny bot. I demolished it aftter a huge checkmate blunder that I sacrificed both rook and QUEEN.

its common for me on lichess :Mul123

leviber2

👍👍

Samrat2semm

i am an 1800 rated player and drew with a 1900 with a 90+ accuracy for both sides. the game also reached the endgame

TheYeetwins
magipi

A 700 rated player opened this topic to brag about his "accuracy". 3 years later the topic is somehow still running. And the punchline: the guy is still 700 rated.

edelweiss113

is 89.8% accuracy good for a 1400

mercatorproject
magipi wrote:

A 700 rated player opened this topic to brag about his "accuracy". 3 years later the topic is somehow still running. And the punchline: the guy is still 700 rated.

I did not see any bragging here.

"Recently I've been analysing my games and I have around 90-95 accuracy, is this normal? is it a bug? will I get banned?"

mercatorproject

The other thing is that he now has has a 1000+ rating in the time control he was talking about.

ItsTwoDuece

Considering that opponents at your elo likely lose pieces, if you simply dont do that youll probably get very high accuracy- once you have a materially winning position practically any half decent move will maintain your advantage, so the accuracy calculator is a lot more lenient. It's nothing out of the ordinary.

Duncan-Mcloud43

I really don't feel that 90% and up for a sub 1000 elo is normal at all. I think that if you constantly scoring that high your final elo should be around 1800 to 2000 elo with this level of consistent accuracy.

Duncan-Mcloud43
magipi wrote:

A 700 rated player opened this topic to brag about his "accuracy". 3 years later the topic is somehow still running. And the punchline: the guy is still 700 rated.

but how? It must not be consistent at all. Did he only play one game at 95%?

magipi
Duncan-Mcloud43 wrote:
magipi wrote:

A 700 rated player opened this topic to brag about his "accuracy". 3 years later the topic is somehow still running. And the punchline: the guy is still 700 rated.

but how? It must not be consistent at all. Did he only play one game at 95%?

One or more, it doesn't matter.

The most likely explanation is that the guy only reviewed his quickest wins. And certainly not his lost games.