how do you hit 100% accuracy? I never understood that
Is 90 accuracy normal?
Recently I've been analysing my games and I have around 90-95 accuracy, is this normal? is it a bug? will I get banned?
nooooooo bro you're just goooooooooood
Play against higher rated players and it will adjust to reality. Stronger opposition makes you better.
90+ accuracy is not even common among 2200 rated players, they often at least get 83 accuracy every game. THeir games often last until endgame. I actually once got a 96.6 accuracy with 2 brilliant moves in a ROW against the 2500 danny bot. I demolished it aftter a huge checkmate blunder that I sacrificed both rook and QUEEN.
its common for me on lichess :Mul123
i am an 1800 rated player and drew with a 1900 with a 90+ accuracy for both sides. the game also reached the endgame
A 700 rated player opened this topic to brag about his "accuracy". 3 years later the topic is somehow still running. And the punchline: the guy is still 700 rated.
A 700 rated player opened this topic to brag about his "accuracy". 3 years later the topic is somehow still running. And the punchline: the guy is still 700 rated.
I did not see any bragging here.
"Recently I've been analysing my games and I have around 90-95 accuracy, is this normal? is it a bug? will I get banned?"
Considering that opponents at your elo likely lose pieces, if you simply dont do that youll probably get very high accuracy- once you have a materially winning position practically any half decent move will maintain your advantage, so the accuracy calculator is a lot more lenient. It's nothing out of the ordinary.
I really don't feel that 90% and up for a sub 1000 elo is normal at all. I think that if you constantly scoring that high your final elo should be around 1800 to 2000 elo with this level of consistent accuracy.
A 700 rated player opened this topic to brag about his "accuracy". 3 years later the topic is somehow still running. And the punchline: the guy is still 700 rated.
but how? It must not be consistent at all. Did he only play one game at 95%?
A 700 rated player opened this topic to brag about his "accuracy". 3 years later the topic is somehow still running. And the punchline: the guy is still 700 rated.
but how? It must not be consistent at all. Did he only play one game at 95%?
One or more, it doesn't matter.
The most likely explanation is that the guy only reviewed his quickest wins. And certainly not his lost games.
90 is best