of course, lol :D
:)
Sort:
hessmaster wrote:
Complete agreement!!
No editing?
Hmmm...I doubt that.
It was like that when I took the PGN. you can tell because at moves 2 and 3 it says 0-0 when it is a random king move
hessmaster wrote:
Wow! We should create a new variant:Sharon chess!
For people like Sharon who need help
I have to say this is an odd conversation. But people, be nice!!! :( maybe sharon just doesn't understand what you guys mean.
hessmaster wrote:
Reepacheep wrote:
hessmaster wrote:
Wow! We should create a new variant:Sharon chess!
For people like Sharon who need help
I have to say this is an odd conversation. But people, be nice!!! :( maybe sharon just doesn't understand what you guys mean.
No, I don't understand what this is about. You see, what sharon has done wrong is not tell us what we have done wrong, and that is making all the posts on this forum wrong, making the whole forum wrong.
I think you're wrong.
LOL
hessmaster wrote:
Kantplaychess wrote:
hessmaster wrote:
Reepacheep wrote:
hessmaster wrote:
Wow! We should create a new variant:Sharon chess!
For people like Sharon who need help
I have to say this is an odd conversation. But people, be nice!!! :( maybe sharon just doesn't understand what you guys mean.
No, I don't understand what this is about. You see, what sharon has done wrong is not tell us what we have done wrong, and that is making all the posts on this forum wrong, making the whole forum wrong.
I think you're wrong.
We are all wrong.
Wow. really?????? Gosh, I almost forgot what we are talking about :p. :) :D sharon, just what do you need help with? We want to help but don't know how.
;(
Reepacheep wrote:
I have to say this is an odd conversation. But people, be nice!!! :(
Don't nag!!! (And I don't think this conversation is that odd at all...looks like you haven't been here for too long.)
hessmaster wrote:
Kantplaychess wrote:
hessmaster wrote:
Reepacheep wrote:
hessmaster wrote:
Wow! We should create a new variant:Sharon chess!
For people like Sharon who need help
I have to say this is an odd conversation. But people, be nice!!! :( maybe sharon just doesn't understand what you guys mean.
No, I don't understand what this is about. You see, what sharon has done wrong is not tell us what we have done wrong, and that is making all the posts on this forum wrong, making the whole forum wrong.
I think you're wrong.
We are all wrong.
I think you might be right...
ivandh wrote:
hessmaster wrote:
Kantplaychess wrote:
hessmaster wrote:
Reepacheep wrote:
hessmaster wrote:
Wow! We should create a new variant:Sharon chess!
For people like Sharon who need help
I have to say this is an odd conversation. But people, be nice!!! :( maybe sharon just doesn't understand what you guys mean.
No, I don't understand what this is about. You see, what sharon has done wrong is not tell us what we have done wrong, and that is making all the posts on this forum wrong, making the whole forum wrong.
I think you're wrong.
We are all wrong.
I think you might be right...
We are all left!
No, actually Sharon is a lush. Oops sorry...wrong Sharon. 
hessmaster wrote:
jamesmaster888 wrote:
ivandh wrote:
hessmaster wrote:
Kantplaychess wrote:
hessmaster wrote:
Reepacheep wrote:
hessmaster wrote:
Wow! We should create a new variant:Sharon chess!
For people like Sharon who need help
I have to say this is an odd conversation. But people, be nice!!! :( maybe sharon just doesn't understand what you guys mean.
No, I don't understand what this is about. You see, what sharon has done wrong is not tell us what we have done wrong, and that is making all the posts on this forum wrong, making the whole forum wrong.
I think you're wrong.
We are all wrong.
I think you might be right...
We are all left!
We are all wrong and nothing but wrong. End of story. This whole forum is wrong too.
Wrong again...
Dec 26, 2011
0
#34
ivandh wrote:
hessmaster wrote:
Kantplaychess wrote:
hessmaster wrote:
Reepacheep wrote:
hessmaster wrote:
Wow! We should create a new variant:Sharon chess!
For people like Sharon who need help
I have to say this is an odd conversation. But people, be nice!!! :( maybe sharon just doesn't understand what you guys mean.
No, I don't understand what this is about. You see, what sharon has done wrong is not tell us what we have done wrong, and that is making all the posts on this forum wrong, making the whole forum wrong.
I think you're wrong.
We are all wrong.
I think you might be right...
Are you sure?
hessmaster wrote:
Kantplaychess wrote:
hessmaster wrote:
jamesmaster888 wrote:
ivandh wrote:
hessmaster wrote:
Kantplaychess wrote:
hessmaster wrote:
Reepacheep wrote:
hessmaster wrote:
Wow! We should create a new variant:Sharon chess!
For people like Sharon who need help
I have to say this is an odd conversation. But people, be nice!!! :( maybe sharon just doesn't understand what you guys mean.
No, I don't understand what this is about. You see, what sharon has done wrong is not tell us what we have done wrong, and that is making all the posts on this forum wrong, making the whole forum wrong.
I think you're wrong.
We are all wrong.
I think you might be right...
We are all left!
We are all wrong and nothing but wrong. End of story. This whole forum is wrong too.
Wrong again...
This whole forum is wrong wrong wrong wrong and we are wrong wrong wrong and all I can think of with all these "wrong posts" is the word:WRONG!!!!!!!!
Wrong! (Yes I have nothing better to do with my time)
You only say because even fused Bobnus Fischarlsen couldn't see that move if they had days to think about it. The only thing Sharon has done wrong is reveal the extent of her chess genius; there's no longer any reason for us mere mortals to play the game.