Andrew tate - Piers Morgan (95% accuracy??)

I agree with KevinOSh here, the game itself vould have been set up a lot better esp since we have seen tate play chess prior to this. At the very least some sort of time management would have been good to see lol

He has been released nd there was no evidence for anything.

YOu have to take back calling him a scumbag now. 

that's not what snopes says.

are you dumb? do you have a police report? what  does Snopes say? do they provide any evidence? You cant just look at articles online, when its become a well known thing articles are usually biased based on what the company supports. Andrew tates not popular with mainstream media so he always gets bad press regardless.

You need to show actual evidence of what his arrest involved and what he was charged with, if anything.

put him back in jail

buddy you are obsessed over him. i already know that youre a nerdy loser who has achieved nothing in his life.

hah

Yes

fr

Nah, nothing suspicious at all here.   Can't stand the dude, but this is just like any number of 95+ accuracy games my noob a** racks up against opponents who fatally blunder early while it's still book.  Even Tate's mop-up close was uninspiring and amateurish.

No way piers morgan played like 1.2k elo player in this game lol even my goofy 900 elo self is cringing at this. He literally castled while his queen was in danger. Seriously?

It's funny you comment this, because all i had to do was go to your profile and look at literally your first loss here: https://www.chess.com/game/live/68607184581?username=deadmemer1

You literally lost all of your pieces and got mated in a period of 3-4 moves.. and you're here making fun of Piers Morgans moves when he lasted almost 10 moves longer against a much stronger opponent than you did against an opponent of the same rating. 

be quiet, humble yourself.

1: I did not lose nearly as bad as Piers did, but I was still pretty much deadlost so I chose to end it early. 2: I don't know why you would say I lost "literally all my pieces" when me and my opponent had the same material besides the one rook they were up. 

Oh, yeah, you're that anti-lgbtq pro-Israel regime person. Even if what you were saying was true I'm not gonna let myself be offended by it cuz of the messed up stuff you believe in.

Being pro israel is messed up? being anti-lgbt, a group that is currently preying on children is messed up?

you're the disgusting person here not me.

I dont care if you're offended by being exposed but you can't talk smack about Piers morgans play when your last loss was even worse than his.

Assuming lgbtq people prey on children any more than straight people/grouping all lgbtq people with lgbtq people that do that is stupid.

haha no

But I didn't tho, I made an entire comment about it, oh hey it's right on the last page you can check it out.

your analysis is incorrect, because you literally blundered 3 pieces in a row then got checkmated. Piers Morgan just forgot his queen was being attacked and castled. after that he didnt blunder pieces right after one another. 

On top of that Andrew tate is a much stronger player than him, where as you performed WORSE against a SIMILAR rated opponent, so your game was objectively even more stupid and poorly played than piers morgan but ur sitting here going "im a 900 and even i would of played better".

Didn't see anyone post his lichess. He's still active about once a week. I guess when he has access to a phone during visiting hours or something (no idea)

https://lichess.org/@/CobraTate

It's confirmed him

I don't think it is him because on chess.com he plays queens gambit, philidor and QGD and is 1650 blitz.

Proof of what.

That's not Andrew Tate, sorry to break it to you.

That's just a random expert with "Tate" in his screenname.