I beat a 2000 bot (Li) while just being 1148. Made a forum about it
where is the forum?
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-showcase/i-just-defeated-li-and-im-only-1148-rated-59808096
It took you 50 games, but I just beat wally in my second try, where is analysis though
I beat a 2000 bot (Li) while just being 1148. Made a forum about it
where is the forum?
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-showcase/i-just-defeated-li-and-im-only-1148-rated-59808096
It took you 50 games, but I just beat wally in my second try, where is analysis though
ya, but ur wayyyy better lol. I'm only 1148. I beat Li which is 2000 but Wally is only 1800.
Yay I just beat Antonio first time without constant hints
I beat lorenzo who is 1800 and im only 1000
I beat lorenzo who is 1800 and im only 1000
I beat Li who is 2000 an I'm only 1150 but it's rlly amazing that u beat him
you know actually by stroke of luck i beat my chess coach when i was 800 who was 1800
yeah in my experience the chess.com bots make random blunders that are often easy to spot. They're about as easy to notice as mistakes made by human 1000 players. At least for me, they start getting difficult to beat around the 1800 level, probably because I can't spot the mistakes higher rated bots make. That is my input, not sure if it was at all helpful
He made no blunders in the game
that is not what the game analysis says. it says he made 5 inaccuracies, 4 mistakes, and 1 blunder.
He made that blunder at the very end, so it doesn't count as blunder, when he was just left with king and I was completely winning.
he made two bad errors back to back on moves 37 and 38 when the game was even. you were then able to hammer out a glorious victory about 30 moves later...
yeah in my experience the chess.com bots make random blunders that are often easy to spot. They're about as easy to notice as mistakes made by human 1000 players. At least for me, they start getting difficult to beat around the 1800 level, probably because I can't spot the mistakes higher rated bots make. That is my input, not sure if it was at all helpful
He made no blunders in the game
that is not what the game analysis says. it says he made 5 inaccuracies, 4 mistakes, and 1 blunder.
He made that blunder at the very end, so it doesn't count as blunder, when he was just left with king and I was completely winning.
he made two bad errors back to back on moves 37 and 38 when the game was even. you were then able to hammer out a glorious victory about 30 moves later...
so what, even a 1800 player too makes mistakes, also it was a very tight game, so there were very few good moves, so a normal player would too have made mistakes, me too made a blunder over there, also it was not a big error like giving a piece for free, the material was equal
yeah in my experience the chess.com bots make random blunders that are often easy to spot. They're about as easy to notice as mistakes made by human 1000 players. At least for me, they start getting difficult to beat around the 1800 level, probably because I can't spot the mistakes higher rated bots make. That is my input, not sure if it was at all helpful
He made no blunders in the game
that is not what the game analysis says. it says he made 5 inaccuracies, 4 mistakes, and 1 blunder.
He made that blunder at the very end, so it doesn't count as blunder, when he was just left with king and I was completely winning.
he made two bad errors back to back on moves 37 and 38 when the game was even. you were then able to hammer out a glorious victory about 30 moves later...
so what, even a 1800 player too makes mistakes, also it was a very tight game, so there were very few good moves, so a normal player would too have made mistakes, me too made a blunder over there, also it was not a big error like giving a piece for free, the material was equal
so kudos to you. you beat a bot. every last one of us on this site has beaten bots of much higher rating. welcome to the club. a very, very, large club...
yeah in my experience the chess.com bots make random blunders that are often easy to spot. They're about as easy to notice as mistakes made by human 1000 players. At least for me, they start getting difficult to beat around the 1800 level, probably because I can't spot the mistakes higher rated bots make. That is my input, not sure if it was at all helpful
He made no blunders in the game
that is not what the game analysis says. it says he made 5 inaccuracies, 4 mistakes, and 1 blunder.
He made that blunder at the very end, so it doesn't count as blunder, when he was just left with king and I was completely winning.
he made two bad errors back to back on moves 37 and 38 when the game was even. you were then able to hammer out a glorious victory about 30 moves later...
so what, even a 1800 player too makes mistakes, also it was a very tight game, so there were very few good moves, so a normal player would too have made mistakes, me too made a blunder over there, also it was not a big error like giving a piece for free, the material was equal
so kudos to you. you beat a bot. every last one of us on this site has beaten bots of much higher rating. welcome to the club. a very, very, large club...
But, doing it in 2nd try is a different thing, in a game with no blunders and no gifting of pieces.
yeah in my experience the chess.com bots make random blunders that are often easy to spot. They're about as easy to notice as mistakes made by human 1000 players. At least for me, they start getting difficult to beat around the 1800 level, probably because I can't spot the mistakes higher rated bots make. That is my input, not sure if it was at all helpful
He made no blunders in the game
that is not what the game analysis says. it says he made 5 inaccuracies, 4 mistakes, and 1 blunder.
He made that blunder at the very end, so it doesn't count as blunder, when he was just left with king and I was completely winning.
he made two bad errors back to back on moves 37 and 38 when the game was even. you were then able to hammer out a glorious victory about 30 moves later...
so what, even a 1800 player too makes mistakes, also it was a very tight game, so there were very few good moves, so a normal player would too have made mistakes, me too made a blunder over there, also it was not a big error like giving a piece for free, the material was equal
so kudos to you. you beat a bot. every last one of us on this site has beaten bots of much higher rating. welcome to the club. a very, very, large club...
But, doing it in 2nd try is a different thing, in a game with no blunders and no gifting of pieces.
yeah, right. whatever floats your boat, kid.
how do you know the bot made no errors?
Analysis, btw he made 1 mistake but no blunders
not true.
yeah in my experience the chess.com bots make random blunders that are often easy to spot. They're about as easy to notice as mistakes made by human 1000 players. At least for me, they start getting difficult to beat around the 1800 level, probably because I can't spot the mistakes higher rated bots make. That is my input, not sure if it was at all helpful
He made no blunders in the game
that is not what the game analysis says. it says he made 5 inaccuracies, 4 mistakes, and 1 blunder.
He made that blunder at the very end, so it doesn't count as blunder, when he was just left with king and I was completely winning.
he made two bad errors back to back on moves 37 and 38 when the game was even. you were then able to hammer out a glorious victory about 30 moves later...
so what, even a 1800 player too makes mistakes, also it was a very tight game, so there were very few good moves, so a normal player would too have made mistakes, me too made a blunder over there, also it was not a big error like giving a piece for free, the material was equal
so kudos to you. you beat a bot. every last one of us on this site has beaten bots of much higher rating. welcome to the club. a very, very, large club...
But, doing it in 2nd try is a different thing, in a game with no blunders and no gifting of pieces.
yeah, right. whatever floats your boat, kid.
Btw, I am not a kid, also rated better than you, if you don't want to appreciate anyone, just don't say anyting.
yeah in my experience the chess.com bots make random blunders that are often easy to spot. They're about as easy to notice as mistakes made by human 1000 players. At least for me, they start getting difficult to beat around the 1800 level, probably because I can't spot the mistakes higher rated bots make. That is my input, not sure if it was at all helpful
He made no blunders in the game
that is not what the game analysis says. it says he made 5 inaccuracies, 4 mistakes, and 1 blunder.
He made that blunder at the very end, so it doesn't count as blunder, when he was just left with king and I was completely winning.
he made two bad errors back to back on moves 37 and 38 when the game was even. you were then able to hammer out a glorious victory about 30 moves later...
so what, even a 1800 player too makes mistakes, also it was a very tight game, so there were very few good moves, so a normal player would too have made mistakes, me too made a blunder over there, also it was not a big error like giving a piece for free, the material was equal
so kudos to you. you beat a bot. every last one of us on this site has beaten bots of much higher rating. welcome to the club. a very, very, large club...
But, doing it in 2nd try is a different thing, in a game with no blunders and no gifting of pieces.
yeah, right. whatever floats your boat, kid.
Btw, I am not a kid, also rated better than you, if you don't want to appreciate anyone, just don't say anyting.
well you may not actually be a kid, but with your sad little attempts to draw attention to yourself you are certainly acting like a child. second, the fact that you are higher rated than me (a relative beginner) has absolutely no bearing on this discussion. third, i will say whatever i like and if you dont likke it, feel free to make a superior rebuttal. lastly, at least quit lying about thhis 'amazing accoomplishment.' you told @ponz the bot only made one mistake. that is not true.
I beat a 2000 bot (Li) while just being 1148. Made a forum about it
where is the forum?
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-showcase/i-just-defeated-li-and-im-only-1148-rated-59808096