Forums

I am DEMANDING a master title!!

Sort:
gb00182

.

Sacrificed a Full ROOK

Sacrificed a Full KNIGHT

Checkmated in the middle of the board!!

Opponent is 200+ elo stronger.

I'm Done. Gimme a title.

ThrillerFan

I could beat you with my eyes closed. 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 you think is the English Opening? Pa-Leez! If I had White in this game, you'd have been roasted. Get that rating up another thousand, then start thinking about master. And also, show us the skills over the board in classic time controls. SMH!

gb00182
ThrillerFan wrote:

I could beat you with my eyes closed. 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 you think is the English Opening? Pa-Leez! If I had White in this game, you'd have been roasted. Get that rating up another thousand, then start thinking about master. And also, show us the skills over the board in classic time controls. SMH!

magnus could beat you with his eyes closed, and in a simul.. one hand tied, ears plugged, hungry and sleepy..

does this make you a bad player?

SacrifycedStoat
It was an okay game, but there were blunders and misses my both players. Very far from a master game
4435Historyisthebest
gb00182 wrote:

.

Sacrificed a Full ROOK

Sacrificed a Full KNIGHT

Checkmated in the middle of the board!!

Opponent is 200+ elo stronger.

I'm Done. Gimme a title.

you where losing unless your opponent took the knight the sacrifice of the rook was a blunder

magipi

Too bad that the sacrifice doesn't work against any opponent who bothers to use his brain.

If white plays 27. Kg2, your attack is pretty much over.

Even after 27. Kg3 Nxe5, white just moves away the queen and you are still down a rook.

gb00182
4435Historyisthebest wrote:

you where losing unless your opponent took the knight the sacrifice of the rook was a blunder

you guys are on the wrong track. let me give you an analogy;

you are watching a kid judo tournament, one kid made mistakes and is in a bad situation, other kid is holding him in a locked position, while everbody was expecting him to give up he is just doing some sacrifices and manages to get up top, and more he wins.

what would be your comment? this kiddo has a spark.. with a proper guidance and training, he can be one of the best.. right? kid would be considered to have a potential.

there is this CM title in the chess right? a candidate for mastery. idk why this took a weird turn and some ppl just attack instead of being encouraging

QathetMike

"Opponent is 200+ elo stronger."

math much?

gb00182
QathetMike wrote:

"Opponent is 200+ elo stronger."

math much?

he was higher and i was lower before the match, he lost and i gained elo so gap closed.. much.

RandomChessPlayer62
gb00182 wrote:
4435Historyisthebest wrote:

you where losing unless your opponent took the knight the sacrifice of the rook was a blunder

you guys are on the wrong track. let me give you an analogy;

you are watching a kid judo tournament, one kid made mistakes and is in a bad situation, other kid is holding him in a locked position, while everbody was expecting him to give up he is just doing some sacrifices and manages to get up top, and more he wins.

what would be your comment? this kiddo has a spark.. with a proper guidance and training, he can be one of the best.. right? kid would be considered to have a potential.

there is this CM title in the chess right? a candidate for mastery. idk why this took a weird turn and some ppl just attack instead of being encouraging

If that kiddo was in a really bad position, it's the other kiddo's fault for letting him escape.

And also you literally said your opponent was just using cheap tactics, and that you weren't in much danger.

magipi
gb00182 wrote:
 

you guys are on the wrong track. let me give you an analogy;

Your analogy is completely backwards. It was you who had a better position, then you tried to throw it all away with a bad sacrifice, but your opponent collapsed instead of winning.

Mittttens
gb00182 wrote:
4435Historyisthebest wrote:

you where losing unless your opponent took the knight the sacrifice of the rook was a blunder

you guys are on the wrong track. let me give you an analogy;

you are watching a kid judo tournament, one kid made mistakes and is in a bad situation, other kid is holding him in a locked position, while everbody was expecting him to give up he is just doing some sacrifices and manages to get up top, and more he wins.

what would be your comment? this kiddo has a spark.. with a proper guidance and training, he can be one of the best.. right? kid would be considered to have a potential.

there is this CM title in the chess right? a candidate for mastery. idk why this took a weird turn and some ppl just attack instead of being encouraging

Please read the fide website

RandomChessPlayer62

Mittttens
RandomChessPlayer62 wrote:

Correct

sleepyzenith

wow

HangingPiecesChomper

chess.com should just give you the CM title already, seemed better than the CMs I play against.

ChessGT17

Watch bro get banned

stockfish17_4000rated
ThrillerFan wrote:

I could beat you with my eyes closed. 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 you think is the English Opening? Pa-Leez! If I had White in this game, you'd have been roasted. Get that rating up another thousand, then start thinking about master. And also, show us the skills over the board in classic time controls. SMH!

Magnus could beat you drunk, with his eyes closed, does that make you a bad player? NO! im like that too

aserew12
stockfish17_4000rated wrote:
ThrillerFan wrote:

I could beat you with my eyes closed. 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 you think is the English Opening? Pa-Leez! If I had White in this game, you'd have been roasted. Get that rating up another thousand, then start thinking about master. And also, show us the skills over the board in classic time controls. SMH!

Magnus could beat you drunk, with his eyes closed, does that make you a bad player? NO! im like that too

Magnus can beat roman drunk

aserew12

*rozman