I am DEMANDING a master title!!

Much needed reality check imho. This is a case of "I'm ahead but I blundered. Then my opponent blundered back so I'm ahead again and I managed to convert eventually." It happens in every rating range. Everyone saw it for what it was. It's normal to feel elated after a win. In that game, you were the better player so go celebrate.

Everyone is just telling you to keep it reasonable. Good on everyone for not letting you cope. I'd say that's kinder than gassing you up with lies and delusion.

Just because it wasn't a perfect game you got downvoted to hell. This site is full of bullies who aren't good at chess themselves.

There's more to life than rage baiting and sandbagging dude. We all know that the reason why he got so much criticism was due to his delusion. Doesn't take an intermediate player to tell that the game he played wasn't really master level.

It's clear as day that you're only commenting in the forums to start drama/friction. And yes, i'm probably less skilled than you but that doesn't invalid my point. My point still stands.

I mean, try hard and get one

The problem with that is that it is TRUE that he played an okay-ish game, and that he was obvi the better player, but you gotta understand the reason for the criticism is because of the overexaggeration of the victory, and people offered CONSTRUCTIVE criticism as to why this game was not master-class, and just simply pointed out errors, in a polite manner. Also, you got the wrong usage of metaphorical there, I think what you maybe meant to say was sarcasm, since 'metaphorical' means to involve using metaphors (metaphors are figures of speech where a word or phrase denoting one kind of object or action is used in place of another to suggest a likeliness or analogy between them.)

There was definitely no similarity between a game like that and a master-class game played between strong (possibly titled) players.

Bro A Chess Master Title should be on Chess.com Lichess has one

finally someone got it.

what is going on here is morelikely; you watch a video and say "guy deserves an oscar" and a random guy quotes the prerequsities of literal oscar awards.. and argues for real.

#internet

THATS called sarcasm, a joke or rather overexaggerated event, you did not imply anything of the sort, and said your game was still master-class even though people pointed out blunders and wrong sacrifices, yet you still fought. You could have admit defeat and said that you were being sarcastic, but you DOUBLED down and kept fighting, and when you were losing, you said people were getting the wrong idea and this and that. On a side note, why do you keep going for examples, just weirds me out a bit.

After getting initial criticism, you never once said it was sarcastic, a joke, or overexaggerated. Maybe you should have mentioned that, and the criticism would have died down immensly.

true most people were not very polite, but a few were nice and had good constructive criticism.

Chess Master title is not a real title, if you are referring to the CM title, then it is Candidate Master, not chess master. CM title is on chess.com. FIDE titles include FM (FIDE Master) and GM (Grand Master) also IM (International Master). Forgot to mention NM (National Master), LM (Life Master) and SM (Senior Master). These titles are less well known since they are USCF titles, the most notable USCF Titles are NM and CM.

Funny how people keep bashing the op when i would easily crush all of them, and I'm not that good myself. And people set the bar for master level way too high when I've seen how some of them play on this site.

Ok, so? Just because some titled players blunder from time to time, that does not mean they're bad. Most likely you would be referring to random blitz and bullet games, but OTB is different. It is the true chess, the chess of strategy and thinking. The whole point of a "Master" title is that you play better chess than most, and sure you will have some bad times and some bad games, but OVERALL they are better than most. And also, don't use your skill as leverage for your useless argument. You don't make any point by saying "Funny how people keep bashing the op when i would easily crush all of them, and I'm not that good myself." this is not about that in almost any way and mentioning that is weird and unnecessary. The point is that this user is talking about being master-class level and even doubled down on his/her second post. We (or at least a few of us) are offering CONSTRUCTIVE criticism. And of course you would crush most of us, you have more experience and skill, that's clear. What's your point and why is it relevant in this argument? We are NOT calling the OP bad, rather explaining and offering insight into the game at hand.

This game to me seemed to be very high level. I could easily see 2 masters playing it.

Join international undergroudn chess federation You are Definitely worth it my dear friend Stop FIDE fide is rigged

Beautiful rook sac!!!

i demand free premium!

Rxh2 was just a really bad move though. The knight sac was good, but still completely losing if your opponent responded properly. If you played these moves against a master you would have lost like 5 moves later. Interesting attempt though.

okay guys, thanks for your positive and negative criticisms, they are all welcome. My intention was to have some fun, and share it. Some might have taken it too serious, but it's okay though.

to clarify; i know fide rules on master titles, and yeah i don't deserve any title. i'm nobody.

thanks for your time, i wish you have a good day