I deserve the 'M' title (like here) for my efforts in Puzzle Rush Survival. Before anybody starts, it's been confirmed by Chess.com/Fair Play.
But, the Title Team simply said, we don't do this now...
🙄
I gave myself the "Puzzle Duel Master" title as a banner (PDM) for my incredible achievements in chesskids only good feature.
I think it looks pretty good 
This game to me seemed to be very high level. I could easily see 2 masters playing it.
Now I am considering whether you are either a troll or just oblivious. Do you see how this game was played? I mean look at the analysis, the multiple blunders, mistakes and inaccuracies every 2 moves? Are you okay in the head? Even looking at the game from a surface level will show you how not-so-good the game was.
Edit: Maybe you saw them play in hyperbullet or something LMAO otherwise this would neer happen, just consider it.
Also, it's pretty normal for games in that rating range, literally nothing is wrong with that. Infact, the OP was creative and intuitive which I applaud, but it very far from masterclass, or anywhere near 2200-2800 level OTB and online.
This game to me seemed to be very high level. I could easily see 2 masters playing it.
Now I am considering whether you are either a troll or just oblivious. Do you see how this game was played? I mean look at the analysis, the multiple blunders, mistakes and inaccuracies every 2 moves? Are you okay in the head? Even looking at the game from a surface level will show you how not-so-good the game was.
Edit: Maybe you saw them play in hyperbullet or something LMAO otherwise this would neer happen, just consider it.
I've seen masters get 60% accuracy and this game was at least as accurate as that.
This game to me seemed to be very high level. I could easily see 2 masters playing it.
Now I am considering whether you are either a troll or just oblivious. Do you see how this game was played? I mean look at the analysis, the multiple blunders, mistakes and inaccuracies every 2 moves? Are you okay in the head? Even looking at the game from a surface level will show you how not-so-good the game was.
Edit: Maybe you saw them play in hyperbullet or something LMAO otherwise this would neer happen, just consider it.
I've seen masters get 60% accuracy and this game was at least as accurate as that.
That's because game review is more forgiving towards low-rated players
I'm Done. Gimme a title.
Have you seen that - instead of this ridiculous 24. ... Bxf3+ - you could have played 24. ... Nxe5: 25. fxe5? Qxg4!; 25. Bxb7 Nxg4!
I'm done, give your title back.
I'll give you a title, you can be a candidate for candidate master, I'll call it CCM
you are a 1400. you don't get a title for one good game, you get it for a lot of them. play a dozen more games like that and then i'll see
This game to me seemed to be very high level. I could easily see 2 masters playing it.
Now I am considering whether you are either a troll or just oblivious. Do you see how this game was played? I mean look at the analysis, the multiple blunders, mistakes and inaccuracies every 2 moves? Are you okay in the head? Even looking at the game from a surface level will show you how not-so-good the game was.
Edit: Maybe you saw them play in hyperbullet or something LMAO otherwise this would neer happen, just consider it.
I've seen masters get 60% accuracy and this game was at least as accurate as that.
you refer to rare and specific scenarios, this 'game' is not the only game the OP plays that bad. there's a big difference between doing it occasionally and doing it every game or so. Also, the game review is more friendly/ forgiving to lower Elo players. (as said in post 48)
Sos pentagon
This game to me seemed to be very high level. I could easily see 2 masters playing it.
Now I am considering whether you are either a troll or just oblivious. Do you see how this game was played? I mean look at the analysis, the multiple blunders, mistakes and inaccuracies every 2 moves? Are you okay in the head? Even looking at the game from a surface level will show you how not-so-good the game was.
Edit: Maybe you saw them play in hyperbullet or something LMAO otherwise this would neer happen, just consider it.
I've seen masters get 60% accuracy and this game was at least as accurate as that.
That's because game review is more forgiving towards low-rated players
This was explained to Chompy guy multiple times already. He's just a blatant troll.
you where losing unless your opponent took the knight the sacrifice of the rook was a blunder
you guys are on the wrong track. let me give you an analogy;
you are watching a kid judo tournament, one kid made mistakes and is in a bad situation, other kid is holding him in a locked position, while everbody was expecting him to give up he is just doing some sacrifices and manages to get up top, and more he wins.
what would be your comment? this kiddo has a spark.. with a proper guidance and training, he can be one of the best.. right? kid would be considered to have a potential.
there is this CM title in the chess right? a candidate for mastery. idk why this took a weird turn and some ppl just attack instead of being encouraging
@gb00182
Congrats on the win. But I have to say, if you learn to look at the game objectively, instead of simply through the lens of victory, you'd see why people are the way they are. The higher rated you get as a player, the more fastidious and detail-oriented you become. And when people post games proclaiming master level prowess, well they start licking their chops. A lot of them aren't very constructive or so it seems, but if they happen to point out mistakes, albeit in a douchey manner, just take it with a grain of salt. I'd be kinder about and say something like " rxh2 was just a massive blunder. King takes and after any checks he goes to g2 and has a lot of pieces around him to aid in his defense. The attack fails and white will win with superior material. Luckily your opponent is a beginner and made terrible blunders to give you the game back." So the lesson from this: Make sure the sacrifice is sound. Do not sacrifice a piece unless you know with an absolute certainty that it works.
Anyway, keep going. 1200 - 1300 is a fun range with lots of learning.
Good luck!
Post edit: 🤣🤣 I didn't realize you'd climbed 200 points since the original post. Well done!
you where losing unless your opponent took the knight the sacrifice of the rook was a blunder
you guys are on the wrong track. let me give you an analogy;
you are watching a kid judo tournament, one kid made mistakes and is in a bad situation, other kid is holding him in a locked position, while everbody was expecting him to give up he is just doing some sacrifices and manages to get up top, and more he wins.
what would be your comment? this kiddo has a spark.. with a proper guidance and training, he can be one of the best.. right? kid would be considered to have a potential.
there is this CM title in the chess right? a candidate for mastery. idk why this took a weird turn and some ppl just attack instead of being encouraging
@gb00182
Congrats on the win. But I have to say, if you learn to look at the game objectively, instead of simply through the lens of victory, you'd see why people are the way they are. The higher rated you get as a player, the more fastidious and detail-oriented you become. And when people post games proclaiming master level prowess, well they start licking their chops. A lot of them aren't very constructive or so it seems, but if they happen to point out mistakes, albeit in a douchey manner, just take it with a grain of salt. I'd be kinder about and say something like " rxh2 was just a massive blunder. King takes and after any checks he goes to g2 and has a lot of pieces around him to aid in his defense. The attack fails and white will win with superior material. Luckily your opponent is a beginner and made terrible blunders to give you the game back." So the lesson from this: Make sure the sacrifice is sound. Do not sacrifice a piece unless you know with an absolute certainty that it works.
Anyway, keep going. 1200 - 1300 is a fun range with lots of learning.
Good luck!
Post edit: 🤣🤣 I didn't realize you'd climbed 200 points since the original post. Well done!
thank you for being constructive, and well mannered. Recently realized it's a might short supply around here. People just want you to be.. gone, nothing, destroyed. I said "it's okay dudes, I was just joking around, I'm jıst nobody" and everything settled. People become terrified when you do something a bit interesting, and maybe a bit successfu herel. They probably keep comparing in the back of their heads and start to see you as an enemy.. this is frikking a mental place.. anyways.
Thanks again for friendly advices. You are welcome all the way. I agree you on sacrificing in the right way, i recently watched a few videos about that, that's a mostly overlooked area to improve i guess. Maybe because of Tal or similar characters..
you might know how he said "there are two types of sacrifices, my sacrifices and correct ones".. well since he was a cool dude, the idea feels motivating.
you where losing unless your opponent took the knight the sacrifice of the rook was a blunder
you guys are on the wrong track. let me give you an analogy;
you are watching a kid judo tournament, one kid made mistakes and is in a bad situation, other kid is holding him in a locked position, while everbody was expecting him to give up he is just doing some sacrifices and manages to get up top, and more he wins.
what would be your comment? this kiddo has a spark.. with a proper guidance and training, he can be one of the best.. right? kid would be considered to have a potential.
there is this CM title in the chess right? a candidate for mastery. idk why this took a weird turn and some ppl just attack instead of being encouraging
@gb00182
Congrats on the win. But I have to say, if you learn to look at the game objectively, instead of simply through the lens of victory, you'd see why people are the way they are. The higher rated you get as a player, the more fastidious and detail-oriented you become. And when people post games proclaiming master level prowess, well they start licking their chops. A lot of them aren't very constructive or so it seems, but if they happen to point out mistakes, albeit in a douchey manner, just take it with a grain of salt. I'd be kinder about and say something like " rxh2 was just a massive blunder. King takes and after any checks he goes to g2 and has a lot of pieces around him to aid in his defense. The attack fails and white will win with superior material. Luckily your opponent is a beginner and made terrible blunders to give you the game back." So the lesson from this: Make sure the sacrifice is sound. Do not sacrifice a piece unless you know with an absolute certainty that it works.
Anyway, keep going. 1200 - 1300 is a fun range with lots of learning.
Good luck!
Post edit: 🤣🤣 I didn't realize you'd climbed 200 points since the original post. Well done!
thank you for being constructive, and well mannered. Recently realized it's a might short supply around here. People just want you to be.. gone, nothing, destroyed. I said "it's okay dudes, I was just joking around, I'm nobody" and everything settled. People become terrified when you do something a bit interesting, and maybe a bit successful. They probably keep comparing in the back of their heads and start to see you as an enemy.. this is frikking a mental place.. anyways.
Thanks again for friendly advices. You are welcome all the way. I agree you on sacrificing in the right way, i recently watched a few videos about that, that's an mostly overlooked area to improve i guess. Maybe because of Tal or similar characters..
you might know how he said "there are two types of sacrifices, my sacrifices and correct one".. well since he was a cool dude, the idea feels motivating.
We're chess players here, our heads are huge even without chess brain (huge ego). My explanation is that my main source of entertainment is debates (same for many others), and this post had some easy points to disprove that paint a target on it's back for debaters.
Wish you luck in improving, even if you don't deserve a title right now you may deserve it later.
you where losing unless your opponent took the knight the sacrifice of the rook was a blunder
you guys are on the wrong track. let me give you an analogy;
you are watching a kid judo tournament, one kid made mistakes and is in a bad situation, other kid is holding him in a locked position, while everbody was expecting him to give up he is just doing some sacrifices and manages to get up top, and more he wins.
what would be your comment? this kiddo has a spark.. with a proper guidance and training, he can be one of the best.. right? kid would be considered to have a potential.
there is this CM title in the chess right? a candidate for mastery. idk why this took a weird turn and some ppl just attack instead of being encouraging
@gb00182
Congrats on the win. But I have to say, if you learn to look at the game objectively, instead of simply through the lens of victory, you'd see why people are the way they are. The higher rated you get as a player, the more fastidious and detail-oriented you become. And when people post games proclaiming master level prowess, well they start licking their chops. A lot of them aren't very constructive or so it seems, but if they happen to point out mistakes, albeit in a douchey manner, just take it with a grain of salt. I'd be kinder about and say something like " rxh2 was just a massive blunder. King takes and after any checks he goes to g2 and has a lot of pieces around him to aid in his defense. The attack fails and white will win with superior material. Luckily your opponent is a beginner and made terrible blunders to give you the game back." So the lesson from this: Make sure the sacrifice is sound. Do not sacrifice a piece unless you know with an absolute certainty that it works.
Anyway, keep going. 1200 - 1300 is a fun range with lots of learning.
Good luck!
Post edit: 🤣🤣 I didn't realize you'd climbed 200 points since the original post. Well done!
thank you for being constructive, and well mannered. Recently realized it's a might short supply around here. People just want you to be.. gone, nothing, destroyed. I said "it's okay dudes, I was just joking around, I'm nobody" and everything settled. People become terrified when you do something a bit interesting, and maybe a bit successful. They probably keep comparing in the back of their heads and start to see you as an enemy.. this is frikking a mental place.. anyways.
Thanks again for friendly advices. You are welcome all the way. I agree you on sacrificing in the right way, i recently watched a few videos about that, that's an mostly overlooked area to improve i guess. Maybe because of Tal or similar characters..
you might know how he said "there are two types of sacrifices, my sacrifices and correct one".. well since he was a cool dude, the idea feels motivating.
We're chess players here, our heads are huge even without chess brain (huge ego). My explanation is that my main source of entertainment is debates (same for many others), and this post had some easy points to disprove that paint a target on it's back for debaters.
Wish you luck in improving, even if you don't deserve a title right now you may deserve it later.
He deserves Underground chess federation one LEM atleast, Such marvelous game friends, Incredible moves, He should Join underground chess federation too
you where losing unless your opponent took the knight the sacrifice of the rook was a blunder
you guys are on the wrong track. let me give you an analogy;
you are watching a kid judo tournament, one kid made mistakes and is in a bad situation, other kid is holding him in a locked position, while everbody was expecting him to give up he is just doing some sacrifices and manages to get up top, and more he wins.
what would be your comment? this kiddo has a spark.. with a proper guidance and training, he can be one of the best.. right? kid would be considered to have a potential.
there is this CM title in the chess right? a candidate for mastery. idk why this took a weird turn and some ppl just attack instead of being encouraging
@gb00182
Congrats on the win. But I have to say, if you learn to look at the game objectively, instead of simply through the lens of victory, you'd see why people are the way they are. The higher rated you get as a player, the more fastidious and detail-oriented you become. And when people post games proclaiming master level prowess, well they start licking their chops. A lot of them aren't very constructive or so it seems, but if they happen to point out mistakes, albeit in a douchey manner, just take it with a grain of salt. I'd be kinder about and say something like " rxh2 was just a massive blunder. King takes and after any checks he goes to g2 and has a lot of pieces around him to aid in his defense. The attack fails and white will win with superior material. Luckily your opponent is a beginner and made terrible blunders to give you the game back." So the lesson from this: Make sure the sacrifice is sound. Do not sacrifice a piece unless you know with an absolute certainty that it works.
Anyway, keep going. 1200 - 1300 is a fun range with lots of learning.
Good luck!
Post edit: 🤣🤣 I didn't realize you'd climbed 200 points since the original post. Well done!
thank you for being constructive, and well mannered. Recently realized it's a might short supply around here. People just want you to be.. gone, nothing, destroyed. I said "it's okay dudes, I was just joking around, I'm nobody" and everything settled. People become terrified when you do something a bit interesting, and maybe a bit successful. They probably keep comparing in the back of their heads and start to see you as an enemy.. this is frikking a mental place.. anyways.
Thanks again for friendly advices. You are welcome all the way. I agree you on sacrificing in the right way, i recently watched a few videos about that, that's an mostly overlooked area to improve i guess. Maybe because of Tal or similar characters..
you might know how he said "there are two types of sacrifices, my sacrifices and correct one".. well since he was a cool dude, the idea feels motivating.
We're chess players here, our heads are huge even without chess brain (huge ego). My explanation is that my main source of entertainment is debates (same for many others), and this post had some easy points to disprove that paint a target on it's back for debaters.
Wish you luck in improving, even if you don't deserve a title right now you may deserve it later.
He deserves Underground chess federation one LEM atleast, Such marvelous game friends, Incredible moves, He should Join underground chess federation too
Go back to your OTF conspiracy theory thread and stop trying to bring other beginners down to your level, you don't even properly play chess you just do an unsound move and then try to hold on to your advantage until you can convert it (if you actually get the advantage).
you where losing unless your opponent took the knight the sacrifice of the rook was a blunder
you guys are on the wrong track. let me give you an analogy;
you are watching a kid judo tournament, one kid made mistakes and is in a bad situation, other kid is holding him in a locked position, while everbody was expecting him to give up he is just doing some sacrifices and manages to get up top, and more he wins.
what would be your comment? this kiddo has a spark.. with a proper guidance and training, he can be one of the best.. right? kid would be considered to have a potential.
there is this CM title in the chess right? a candidate for mastery. idk why this took a weird turn and some ppl just attack instead of being encouraging
@gb00182
Congrats on the win. But I have to say, if you learn to look at the game objectively, instead of simply through the lens of victory, you'd see why people are the way they are. The higher rated you get as a player, the more fastidious and detail-oriented you become. And when people post games proclaiming master level prowess, well they start licking their chops. A lot of them aren't very constructive or so it seems, but if they happen to point out mistakes, albeit in a douchey manner, just take it with a grain of salt. I'd be kinder about and say something like " rxh2 was just a massive blunder. King takes and after any checks he goes to g2 and has a lot of pieces around him to aid in his defense. The attack fails and white will win with superior material. Luckily your opponent is a beginner and made terrible blunders to give you the game back." So the lesson from this: Make sure the sacrifice is sound. Do not sacrifice a piece unless you know with an absolute certainty that it works.
Anyway, keep going. 1200 - 1300 is a fun range with lots of learning.
Good luck!
Post edit: 🤣🤣 I didn't realize you'd climbed 200 points since the original post. Well done!
thank you for being constructive, and well mannered. Recently realized it's a might short supply around here. People just want you to be.. gone, nothing, destroyed. I said "it's okay dudes, I was just joking around, I'm nobody" and everything settled. People become terrified when you do something a bit interesting, and maybe a bit successful. They probably keep comparing in the back of their heads and start to see you as an enemy.. this is frikking a mental place.. anyways.
Thanks again for friendly advices. You are welcome all the way. I agree you on sacrificing in the right way, i recently watched a few videos about that, that's an mostly overlooked area to improve i guess. Maybe because of Tal or similar characters..
you might know how he said "there are two types of sacrifices, my sacrifices and correct one".. well since he was a cool dude, the idea feels motivating.
We're chess players here, our heads are huge even without chess brain (huge ego). My explanation is that my main source of entertainment is debates (same for many others), and this post had some easy points to disprove that paint a target on it's back for debaters.
Wish you luck in improving, even if you don't deserve a title right now you may deserve it later.
He deserves Underground chess federation one LEM atleast, Such marvelous game friends, Incredible moves, He should Join underground chess federation too
Go back to your OTF conspiracy theory thread and stop trying to bring other beginners down to your level, you don't even properly play chess you just do an unsound move and then try to hold on to your advantage until you can convert it (if you actually get the advantage).
Stop bully me, Why bully? Im a true chess partisan and Hero and you mock and buly? You fake stuff with photoshop too to paint me in bad light
you where losing unless your opponent took the knight the sacrifice of the rook was a blunder
you guys are on the wrong track. let me give you an analogy;
you are watching a kid judo tournament, one kid made mistakes and is in a bad situation, other kid is holding him in a locked position, while everbody was expecting him to give up he is just doing some sacrifices and manages to get up top, and more he wins.
what would be your comment? this kiddo has a spark.. with a proper guidance and training, he can be one of the best.. right? kid would be considered to have a potential.
there is this CM title in the chess right? a candidate for mastery. idk why this took a weird turn and some ppl just attack instead of being encouraging
@gb00182
Congrats on the win. But I have to say, if you learn to look at the game objectively, instead of simply through the lens of victory, you'd see why people are the way they are. The higher rated you get as a player, the more fastidious and detail-oriented you become. And when people post games proclaiming master level prowess, well they start licking their chops. A lot of them aren't very constructive or so it seems, but if they happen to point out mistakes, albeit in a douchey manner, just take it with a grain of salt. I'd be kinder about and say something like " rxh2 was just a massive blunder. King takes and after any checks he goes to g2 and has a lot of pieces around him to aid in his defense. The attack fails and white will win with superior material. Luckily your opponent is a beginner and made terrible blunders to give you the game back." So the lesson from this: Make sure the sacrifice is sound. Do not sacrifice a piece unless you know with an absolute certainty that it works.
Anyway, keep going. 1200 - 1300 is a fun range with lots of learning.
Good luck!
Post edit: 🤣🤣 I didn't realize you'd climbed 200 points since the original post. Well done!
thank you for being constructive, and well mannered. Recently realized it's a might short supply around here. People just want you to be.. gone, nothing, destroyed. I said "it's okay dudes, I was just joking around, I'm nobody" and everything settled. People become terrified when you do something a bit interesting, and maybe a bit successful. They probably keep comparing in the back of their heads and start to see you as an enemy.. this is frikking a mental place.. anyways.
Thanks again for friendly advices. You are welcome all the way. I agree you on sacrificing in the right way, i recently watched a few videos about that, that's an mostly overlooked area to improve i guess. Maybe because of Tal or similar characters..
you might know how he said "there are two types of sacrifices, my sacrifices and correct one".. well since he was a cool dude, the idea feels motivating.
We're chess players here, our heads are huge even without chess brain (huge ego). My explanation is that my main source of entertainment is debates (same for many others), and this post had some easy points to disprove that paint a target on it's back for debaters.
Wish you luck in improving, even if you don't deserve a title right now you may deserve it later.
He deserves Underground chess federation one LEM atleast, Such marvelous game friends, Incredible moves, He should Join underground chess federation too
Go back to your OTF conspiracy theory thread and stop trying to bring other beginners down to your level, you don't even properly play chess you just do an unsound move and then try to hold on to your advantage until you can convert it (if you actually get the advantage).
Stop bully me, Why bully? Im a true chess partisan and Hero and you mock and buly? You fake stuff with photoshop too to paint me in bad light
I don't have photoshop, and go back to the OTF basement where you belong
I deserve the 'M' title (like here) for my efforts in Puzzle Rush Survival. Before anybody starts, it's been confirmed by Chess.com/Fair Play.
But, the Title Team simply said, we don't do this now...
🙄