Are Bot's ratings accurate?
Sort:
May 16, 2023
0
#162
No, it’s not accurate at all. If bot ratings were correct I would be rated 1200 when I’m actually rated 600. Because bots with ratings of around 1000-1200 still hang a lot of pieces and blunder a lot, when an actual 1000-rated player would rarely do that.
totally not cuz im only 400 rated and i can beat a 600 rated bot
Jun 10, 2023
0
#165
Absolutely definitely not. I am 802 rated rapid and I beat the 1600 isabela bot on challenge mode
Nov 16, 2023
0
#168
My chess coach tells me that most of the bots are 100-150 points lower than shown. The Elo system with Chess.com is a little different from professional chess systems so it can make you look much better than you are.
Nov 16, 2023
0
#169
I agree that bot's ratings are not accurate as I am a 1100 rated-player and I beated duo and wally.
nah it's not that accurate .. im 570 in blitz and i can beat isabele (1600) with 3 stars ..
I have the same question cuz my rating isn't that much I was able to win a 1200 ranking bot twice without any hints
Feb 12, 2024
0
#172
They are not accurate at all. It's very hard to code a human-like chess engine to play at a certain level.
I agree with you there is one bot that should not be it's rating MARTIN!!!!!
Feb 12, 2024
0
#174
Bots are definitely worse than the elo says they are, but I don't know how by much.
Feb 17, 2024
0
#176
so I played Wei this morning bot rated 2450, its actually my first win against her, also the first time I wasn't trying to play her in blitz, but I won in 82 moves and it said my estimated performance rating in the game was 3050 versus the Bot estimated rating 2800. Now I really would like to say its because I actually played the game that well, and reviewing it seems like I played reasonably well, but 3050 really how does that translate to my real ELO. It has been 9 years since I played in a real tournament will be heading to one in May and am looking forward to it, but I really do wonder if the game review is giving a fair review or is it unrealistic?
Bot ratings are definitely incorrect. If they were correct, I would be a grandmaster because I beat Luk.AI bot rated 2500, and I beat it in about 65 moves. In the game review, It estimated my elo was 2200 and the bot was 1800.
As someone who plays tremendously with bots, I think they are 200 points higher than their actual rating... I have also paired chess.com bots with lichess and magnus ages