Brilliant move

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/77710356363?tab=review

Finally played a game with brilliant move. Previous one was very long time ago.

Unfortunately I don't know how to make my post nice (with a chess table in the comment like alwaysdrop did at https://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-analysis/briliant-move )

Searched my older games with review and found another one with brilliant move https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/77061129209?tab=review

If you want to post the position, you have to use the website. There are more tools for posting when you use the website to view and post in the forum.

/ So the question is -- did you see Qxf6 in this position and still decide to play hxg5?

// Did you know that the word brilliant has two l's?

My concern was that if I don't take that pawn my opponent will take my pawn in the next move (gxh6 I mean) and make a trouble to my knight.

Thank you for notice about two l's

What do you think about this ? I'm beginner https://www.chess.com/analysis/library/DK5Gy983g

Another one https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/68930872077?tab=review

Made that move because I saw he/she can't take my bishop

And another one https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/66947973129?tab=review where I simply wished to trade with pieces a bit

update 21.06.2023 Another one https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/81006240805?tab=review although I didn't get it

Update 05.07.2023 Another one https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/82321353081?tab=review

Update 18.08.2023 https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/86047775007?tab=review

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/89406641751?tab=review

However in both cases I don't understand why chess.com thinks those moves are brilliant

Move 22.... I would have been in trouble without it... and move 13... that bishop was undefended....

Update 09.12.2023: https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/95863494051?tab=review

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/97541518779?tab=review

Why white's move 17 is brilliant? My answer to that would have been queen e7 if I were black

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/105488491115?tab=review

Why they call move 19 for white brilliant?

If not to do it, then the next move is b2xa1 and I can't take that queen

And why black took my knight instead of rook? (move 19)

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/110461871813?tab=review

I thought that move 25 (I gave away the rook) is a blunder and liked more move 30 (that check with knight) which saved my game.

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/111335533881

Why they call move 42 brilliant?

Opponent simply gave away the pawn and I accepted that gift

I didn't expect that he/she will take my knight

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/112961954757?tab=review

Brilliant move in this game was actually narrow escape after nice blunder (both from me and from my opponent)

Update 29.06.2024 https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/113350758059?tab=review

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/119643443058?tab=review

streak day 2