Forums

Can pawns ever move diagonally without a capture? or is this puzzle just wrong

Sort:
Myranda22
Today I got stumped on a puzzle and had to ask it to show me the move, it told me to move my pawn up and to the right but there was no piece there to capture. Unclear if that's a legal move in some particular circumstances or if this puzzle is just wrong? Went through the analysis because I thought it was going crazy, took a screenshot and everything. has anyone else seen this?
Stuckfish

Look at the opponent's previous move. The solution is to make an en passant capture.

Stuckfish

(Please don't listen to anyone who turns up in this thread to say that en passant is forced, that's just a meme)

Stuckfish

It's a special move in chess you can only make with your pawn on the turn immediately after your opponent moved their pawn 2 squares to bypass you being able to capture it with your pawn. If you play a different move on your turn, you're not allowed to capture the pawn like that anymore, so it has to be immediate.

The other special move in chess is called castling, which gets your king to safety in a corner and brings either rook to the middle, it can only be played if the king and the chosen rook haven't moved at all yet in that game and there are no pieces left in the squares between king and rook.

ryanovster

yes you dont have to play en peasent unless its your only legal move

ryanovster

but dont castle if your king has no protection in front of it on either side

Stuckfish
ryanovster wrote:

yes you dont have to play en peasent unless its your only legal move

Or you can resign in that situation tongue.png

I did once see a forced en passant checkmate where en passant was the only legal move and the next move was mate. Think it was in a Gotham video?

DoYouLikeCurry
Ladies and gents we’ve witnessed a beautiful step in OP’s chess journey! En passant, my friend, have a wee look :)
ryanovster
Sporkled wrote:
ryanovster wrote:

yes you dont have to play en peasent unless its your only legal move

Or you can resign in that situation

I did once see a forced en passant checkmate where en passant was the only legal move and the next move was mate. Think it was in a Gotham video?

Gotham Chess is great, you can learn a lot from him.

Stuckfish
ryanovster wrote:
Sporkled wrote:
ryanovster wrote:

yes you dont have to play en peasent unless its your only legal move

Or you can resign in that situation

I did once see a forced en passant checkmate where en passant was the only legal move and the next move was mate. Think it was in a Gotham video?

Gotham Chess is great, you can learn a lot from him.

I wish he would focus less on openings for beginners. I understand he wants to sell courses and there's a lot of (unwise) demand for openings content amongst beginners, but when I was in his target viewer rating bracket I would have really appreciated more practical videos on calculation, mating patterns, coming up with a plan out of the opening, what to look out for so you know when to go for an attack on the enemy king, etc.

Kay-Hamza

I don't think anyone has answered Miranda22's question - I was trying to find an answer to the same question - the puzzle told me to move my pawn diagonally when there was no piece in the square to capture - that's not en passant is it?

ChessGT17

Yes it is lol. Also this is years ago.

Fr3nchToastCrunch

Holy hell

vamsim7
DoYouLikeCurry wrote:
Ladies and gents we’ve witnessed a beautiful step in OP’s chess journey! En passant, my friend, have a wee look :)

Google en passant