Checking if Elo system is oppressive [With proofs]

Yapping is what you're doing. There are few simple steps that can be done to improve the situation with ratings. I commented in other topic, copying here:

They can't break through the low Elo barrier because many low Elo players are highly skilled and they keep each other down. Like if 90% of 200 Elo players are as strong as 1000 Elo, they will be paired against each other and winratio will be 50% so their rating will not change. (sure 5% are truly 200, but another 5% is say 1200 who climb to their unwanted destination - 300 where other 1200s are crumpled). This is just an example, proportions could be different, but when there's not enough crossplay and when initial rating is inherently inaccurate such situations are unavoidable. This is called a localized pool. To remove such pools chess.com needs to conduct mandatory pool-joining tournaments and do hard recalculation with reassignments of ratings. This was described in Arpad Elo (creator of Elo system) book, I'm not making things up. And to prevent such pools, you need to stop rating people right from the start and stop them from affecting rating of others. First they must play a considerable amount of games (like 50 maybe) against players who have a well established rating, then they can receive their initial rating (not like now - you say you're beginner, advanced etc during registration and you get rated immediately and you then affect ratings of everyone - that's crazy). And you should not allow tight matchmaking, must be something random within wide range like +/- 200 Elo to ensure good cross-play, yes that would be predictable win/loss but this is necessary to avoid localized distortions.

Basket is just a janko alt

Janko is probably barely even 25

I don't think so because basket is always trying to start an argument with me and claims Kramnik doesn't accuse people of cheating whereas Janko just wants chess to be fairer even if he is a little extreme.

He had the same profile picture (ai generated ) that janko had about a month ago or even earlier(when he first created the account)

My style and ideas are completely different. No similarities at all. Your conspiracy theory is concerning, are you ok?

Look at my profile pic, it is a pawn. I'm not Janko, I told you, Janko told you. Who is conspiracy theorist. Why do you ignore my point about our ideas being different completely?

Just cause you have "math " doesn't make math correct good sir

And 2. Your aggressively denying it plus i'm ignoring your ideas mostly cause they are all dumb anyway 

So says the conspiracy theorist lol

You don't really have the defence for a profile picture that was the exact same as his

Either 1.your a alt that decided to team up with him or

2.janko

Either way it's basically the same person 🤣😝🤣🤣🤣

On my old account i was stuck at 1300 rating for years, and all of a sudden on my this new account i have 1700 rating. Dunno how its explained.

Perhaps you're playing better.

Or, it could be because your account is relatively new, and you're still riding the "provisional bump", as I call it. Play at least 100 games or so, and you should see your rating settle closer to your actual playing strength (wherever that may be).

We post at different time, Janko is absent while I'm still posting how could that be. Janko also has very distinctive style of writing.

On my old account i was stuck at 1300 rating for years, and all of a sudden on my this new account i have 1700 rating. Dunno how its explained.

Just for reference it exposed yourself 🤣🤣