how good is 2200 elo chess player
Sort:
I want to know how good is 2200 elo chess player is it multiple ahead from 2000 or 2100?
I would say it is “multiple ahead”
Although I'm no cognitive scientist, I feel it must be approximately exponential.
I'm basing that on hearing that chess players, from beginner to pro, become better based on the acquisition of "chunks". Presumably, to be able to defeat a player of a particular strength by a particular percentage, you need to acquire a set number of chunks.
Assuming there's some finite population of useful chunks, as you improve, there's a diminishing number of easy to find chunks you have not yet acquired. If you simplify this a lot, conceptually, it becomes similar to a radioactive decay curve, where each atom is a chunk. Such a curve is logarithmic, which means that the amount of time taken for a given amount of material to decay (or effort and time required to acquire more chunks) is exponential.
If these assumptions are true, then Elo rating is arguably exponential with respect to amount of time, work, or talent required.
1200 elo in disguise
Not very good.
on this, site, 2200 isn't good at all. they hang their pieces so often
On a scale from 100 to infinity I'd say they're about 2200. So 200 points higher than 2000.
2200 is pretty good… I’d say 2300+ on chess.com is elite
Anywhere from 1800-2100 otb
danishyah wrote:
I want to know how good is 2200 elo chess player is it multiple ahead from 2000 or 2100?
Mostly just hanging less pieces and taking them for free
Elo is irrelevant My dear friend It is rigged and opressive system where 99%+ are stuck at low ELo. Abolish ELO!
ShikshaWithPraveen wrote:
Not very good.
Bruh you are a coach and also even if you are 2777 elo doesn't mean 2200 elo isn't good. 2200 is like top 0.2% of players on chess.com
ShikshaWithPraveen wrote:
Not very good.
we get it u are cool
OskarJ2012 wrote:
ShikshaWithPraveen wrote:
Not very good.
Bruh you are a coach and also even if you are 2777 elo doesn't mean 2200 elo isn't good. 2200 is like top 0.2% of players on chess.com
this site is full of bad bots who lose on purpose designed to make people feel better about themselves. go play otb against a 2200 and you'll see a big difference in skill level.
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
OskarJ2012 wrote:
ShikshaWithPraveen wrote:
Not very good.
Bruh you are a coach and also even if you are 2777 elo doesn't mean 2200 elo isn't good. 2200 is like top 0.2% of players on chess.com
this site is full of bad bots who lose on purpose designed to make people feel better about themselves. go play otb against a 2200 and you'll see a big difference in skill level.
Your forgetting 2200s also get tunnel vision:/ it's why we aren't very good in the first place occasionally the tunnel vision is worse than 600s people are people that means we play bad sometimes