is 1600 rating good?
Sort:
The OP is at 1200 now.
Yes good , but why are you 12 hundred? You need to do something about it.
hrarray wrote:
The OP is at 1200 now.
1507* so i am improving fast hope i can get back to 1600
ESP-918 wrote:
Yes good , but why are you 12 hundred? You need to do something about it.
i did and now i am 1507 and gaining point fast hope i can reach 1600 once again fast
Chr0mePl8edSt0vePipe wrote:
Nah, that’s trash. 1707 or higher is considered good. Below that your just trash. And your rating hasn’t stabilized yet so you’re probably even worse. You should probably never log in to chess.com again. No point in wasting your time.
well you are 1657 now so.....
Tacomeats wrote:
Your elo dropping like rock, sir
i am 1507 now so i am getting back to it 
YouEvenLiftBro wrote:
1600 is pretty good. I like to think so anyway because I am a 1600.
You can go into your stats. a 1600 rating is better than 97.5% of chess.com members. Only 1 member in 40 is better than you.
And ... chess.com members are better on average than people who play over the board casually, a few times a year or whatever.
well thanks for the encouragement
Jun 13, 2022
0
#49
YouEvenLiftBro wrote:
1600 is pretty good. I like to think so anyway because I am a 1600.
You can go into your stats. a 1600 rating is better than 97.5% of chess.com members. Only 1 member in 40 is better than you.
And ... chess.com members are better on average than people who play over the board casually, a few times a year or whatever.
Out of active people the percentile would likely change but sure
Jun 13, 2022
0
#50
protocolpawns wrote:
so i wanted to ask if my rating is good? and also can any good player analyze my games (or my last game) and tell me where i need to improve i have played 10 games so far
That is REALLY good im only 700
ScatteredWealth wrote:
Is a rating of 1600 good? Depends on who's asking and who's being asked.
that's confusing
Jun 13, 2022
0
#54
ScatteredWealth wrote:
Is a rating of 1600 good? Depends on who's asking and who's being asked.
A stable 1600 in rapid is pretty good because you have to have a decent amount of knowledge to get there. But it depends on your standards, is it good for you?
I mean I don’t consider myself good (like at all) but that’s because my standards are way too high.
Jun 13, 2022
0
#55
blueemu wrote:
protocolpawns wrote:
blueemu wrote:
Good for what?
for making pasta
1600 is an excellent pasta rating.
lol
Jun 13, 2022
0
#56
Caffeineed wrote:
"Is being able to deadlift 950 pounds good"
"Is winning 7 Super Bowls good?"
"Is being the best tennis player in the world good?"
come on
LOL
Jun 13, 2022
0
#58
ChessFlair01 wrote:
Im pro at making pasta
Anyone for a cheeseball flavored one?
Or maybe strawberry?
Chr0mePl8edSt0vePipe wrote:
Nah, that’s trash. 1707 or higher is considered good. Below that your just trash. And your rating hasn’t stabilized yet so you’re probably even worse. You should probably never log in to chess.com again. No point in wasting your time.
Lol you're Rating is 1523 or sth
