Is 2150 good?
Sort:
2 days ago
0
#22
Nahh 2150 is like the worst elo in the entire world. My 6 month old brother got 2500 rapid after only 7 minutes of playing chess. So to conclude you are bad
2 days ago
0
#23
Hyper-N0va wrote:
Nahh 2150 is like the worst elo in the entire world. My 6 month old brother got 2500 rapid after only 7 minutes of playing chess. So to conclude you are bad
Good achievement for your brother , but it's still bad. He's 6 month old and just 2500 rapid excuses that he played 7 minutes only.
2 days ago
0
#24
The site clearly want to cheer up the youngsters with their bots. The bots are way too far behind the displayed ratings. What is the point of giving bots like +700 rating if they do not match real players performance. The person here might think he can beat humans 2000+, now when he will try it and fail miserably more likely he will lose enthusiasm. Dubious strategy of this site
Annyia3 wrote:
The person here might think he can beat humans 2000+, now when he will try it and fail miserably more likely he will lose enthusiasm.
The person you're talking about left chess.com 6 years ago. So you might be right.
AdarshPatil1 wrote:
I am 2152 on chess.com rapid 10+0
And 2292 on lichess rapid 10+0.
What would be my fide rating? .
lower then ur chesscom
I am 2152 on chess.com rapid 10+0
And 2292 on lichess rapid 10+0.
What would be my fide rating? .
The best way to find it out is to go to a FIDE rated event and get a rating.