More proof this site is rigged

1. You create a new account.

2. You usually win the 5 or 6 games it takes to post normally with pictures and quotes.

3. You meet good competition along the way and you learn something.

4. Then after your 5-10 games, maybe 4-10 games, you start losing. These losses become increasingly more difficult. Shouldn't the competition get easier with losses? Shouldn't you be placed in an easier bracket?

5. You go down 50 points, then 50 more, then 50 more, then 50. STILL, NO EASIER COMPETITION.

How is it that I can be at 1402 (@GonnaKnockYooOut), but I can't beat under 700 with this account? Then I get a warning in a message from chess.com and then I get an easy win.

We are not playing humans on here. We are playing bots which modify their accuracy according to our play. Even if you lower your rating 50 points, they still play better than you in the end. There is one game where they were completely down and then all of a sudden come back playing the right moves.

A signature feature of these bots is if you try to fork the king and queen with the knight, it will prevent it. Resign the game then. Play it again. For example, the Scandinavian. After about 3 or 4 of these Scandinavians, guess what? Now you can fork and take the queen. But then they come back to beat you.

This site is rigged.

Mad cuz bad.

This is exactly the kind of troll thread that should be closed immediately. But it won't be, and it will get at least 200 pointless responses. Meanwhile, the troll has already closed the account.

Lol, get good!!!
Dude closed his account lol

It's true, look at the game I just played in my profile. No human would play this out.

Seeing your technique it was a reasonable assumption by your opponent that the game would end in stalemate more often than not.

Look at the oxymoronic comment.

"Seeing your technique it was a reasonable assumption by your opponent that the game would end in stalemate more often than not."

Which is it, is my technique not good and stalemating or did I avoid queening the other pawns to get mate? You can't have both. You are attacking both ends by talking out of your other end.

I suppose you made several typos in that sentence, because it's just gibberish in its present form.

If you are from Hungary, maybe you need English comprehension lessons, Maggot Pasta.

Are you saying that there is no typo in that sentence? Maybe I do need English comprehension lessons.

Which part looks like it is a typo?

"is my technique not good and stalemating or"

Yes, is stalemating a good technique?

???

Whatever, I'm out. Bye.

same