zachgalea wrote:
is there a difference , like if im 1200 on chess.com what would i be on lichess
If you're Rapid 1200 here, you'll be around 1400-1550 on lichess
what is your chess.com rating compared to your Lichess rating?
Sort:
15 days ago
0
#385
Never played on Lichess, but my chess.com rating is about 300 points higher than my old OTB rating from 25 years ago.
Lichess around 1750 classical.
On this site there is no such category so the ratings mean absolutely nothing. "Rapid" could be anything from 10/0 to 60/0. Totally different disciplines.
800m runners don't compete against 10,000m athletes and comparing them is like measuring apples against oranges.
14 days ago
0
#388
When I ran track in high school, I competed in everything from the 800 to the two mile. Of course, I was not near fast enough to be any good at the 800. Longer distances were my thing. At ten miles, I could hold my own with some of the top runners in my city, although they destroyed me in the two mile.
Can you all sub to this channel https://www.youtube.com/@BoxofwhineJR
Lichess was weird usually on chess.com scholar mate was much more common
9 days ago
0
#392
I am 1400 Rapid here , with 2000 games and 1400 on lichess with 52 games
1300(bullet) here and over 1700 there
About the same in blitz and 100 higher in rapid there
Lichess 1725 classical
chess.com no such category
Get a grip chess.com this is your biggest failing
Yeah. I played 50 matches in lichess and got 2077 and I played 50 matches here and I now have 808. I think both sites should start at the same value, for example 1100, and also the inflation in lichess after you play your first match is like 150?!? So they should make the inflation after every match won and lost equivalent. Everyone agree with me?