Any such discussion - like those of "the best" suffers from lack of definitions and therefore of metrics. What does one mean by "the worst"?
It doesn't need any definitions.
When a group of people who play chess, say a chess tournament, finish the competition there is usually someone who is in last place. That person (or persons if there is a tie) is considered "the worst" within that group.
So "the best" is going to be a country that has players who have high ratings, do well in tournaments, etc. Countries that might be considered "the worst" would probably be ones with low rated players (or possibly no rated players), players who finish poorly in tournaments, etc.
The only exception I can think of is a small, isolated country with a substantial prison population. Prison inmates always seem to be good at chess.
Any such discussion - like those of "the best" suffers from lack of definitions and therefore of metrics. What does one mean by "the worst"?