Here's a gambit idea I came up with. I call it the Reti Gambit: Danish Variation.
It has a theme similar to the Danish Gambit, hence the name I gave it.
Here's a gambit idea I came up with. I call it the Reti Gambit: Danish Variation.
It has a theme similar to the Danish Gambit, hence the name I gave it.
The Mieses Opening: Reverse Pirc Variation.
that's a nice opening, develop every pieces and starting to attack in the center. You must be a good chess player
Thank you for the compliment. I learned some Pirc Defense theory from a friend of mine, and decided to apply the ideas for white instead.
Fighter's Fire Attack
Reason: putting a massive threat on the weak f7 pawn. The attack is unstoppable
Since you like shaming people's openings so much, I'll review yours. First, it's not the best opening but also not the worst opening. The f pawn is actually very weak, you're right about that. But you have your own f pawn that can very well be attacked in the same way and also maybe even a better way with a good attack with a knight. Now let's see about all those arrows. I like the idea a lot about taking advantage of a weak square and getting those out of there, But your knight can be kicked and your bishop can very well be attacked as well with black's knight. Also, there's no way that you will put that much pressure on the rook with one bishop. Yes, a rook is worth more than a bishop always, but a bishop will not put pressure like that on the rook. Also, how do you even let a pawn capture that much material in the opening alone? That's weird. I'd have captured back. I also know about my rating, I'm not the best chess player obviously, and I'm just one teenager online rating your opening. If you think it's good and it works for you, that's great. You do you man. I'm just judging on what I see is possible and not possible.