Why only one flag
Chess.com is BIAS in its policy and discriminatory
Sort:
MatrixDog wrote:
Why would chess.com include over 200 flags
Do you see over 200 flags in the reaction emoji suite? No you dont. The fact that you cant even discuss what’s going on in R and U but show support with the 🇺🇦 flag shows a bias stance towards what’s going on
@MatrixDog Do you see 200 flags in the "react" box? No you don't. This is the problem with the younger generation, most of them don't fully comprehend what's right in front of them. And he's right it is bias discrimination because the picture he screenshot clearly displays a Ukrainian flag only, why not American? Why not Mexican? Why not Russian? I think we know why
MatrixDog wrote:
Why would chess.com include over 200 flags
Where are the 200 flags🤣. All I see is Ukraine
MatrixDog wrote:
Why would chess.com include over 200 flags
Still waiting to be shown the 200 flags in the reaction emoji suite……. ⏱️ hello is this thing on 🎤 (tap’s microphone)👏
Is chess.com actually biased? Read this article, which explains how chess.com actually works. and explain whether Chess.com is BIAS in its policy and discriminatory or not.
lichesdude wrote:
Is chess.com actually biased? Read this article, which explains how chess.com actually works. and explain whether Chess.com is BIAS in its policy and discriminatory or not.
I don’t have to read anything else about their bias policy, they have made posts about ukraine and support ukraine which is perfectly fine with me beacause I want PEACE, and have stated this several times and those comments have been removed stating that Americans dont want WAR because we know where this ends, but how can they have a policy that basically says (NO RELIGION NO POLITICS) but then only have one flag 🇺🇦 in the reaction emoji suite and then post this
lichesdude wrote:
Is chess.com actually biased? Read this article, which explains how chess.com actually works. and explain whether Chess.com is BIAS in its policy and discriminatory or not.
Even though I don’t think this article really addresses my concerns, I still appreciate your attention to the matter. Thank you
👍💯
Fact (not opinion): The Ukraine was bombing the Russian (speaking) population in the Dombass since 2014 and got so officially named a "rogue state" by the European Union authorities for it.
During the Cuban Missiles Crisis in 1962, the USA threatened nuclear WW3 if the Soviets would not give up their plan to install ICBMs in Cuba, and everybody found it "normal". By luck for us all, the Soviets gave up on doing so.
If Soviet nukes on the American borders or NATO (USA being the head of the NATO) bases on the Russian borders, -even when the Russian invasion of the Ukraine is technically illegal (regarding International Laws)-, one has to understand that no superpower such as the USA or Russia can accept to let an other superpower setup bases at their borders, pragmatically speaking.
It's foolish to take side out of a typically one sided narrative that reminds me how we French were told the German never washed themselves and had lots of other nasty habits. Since they were the ennemy... (WW1 official French propaganda).
Besides, and to make it clear, I do apologize to Chess.com, yet, that American company takes side for the USA, then forbid everybody to talk about it. Is it right? Is it wrong? I don't need to tell you: it's childish and stupid: a chess company has no beef with politics and should abstain from taking side in matters that are above their paygrade.
Kaeldorn wrote:
Fact (not opinion): The Ukraine was bombing the Russian (speaking) population in the Dombass since 2014 and got so officially named a "rogue state" by the European Union authorities for it.
During the Cuban Missiles Crisis in 1962, the USA threatened nuclear WW3 if the Soviets would not give up their plan to install ICBMs in Cuba, and everybody found it "normal". By luck for us all, the Soviets gave up on doing so.
If Soviet nukes on the American borders or NATO (USA being the head of the NATO) bases on the Russian borders, -even when the Russian invasion of the Ukraine is technically illegal (regarding International Laws)-, one has to understand that no superpower such as the USA or Russia can accept to let an other superpower setup bases at their borders, pragmatically speaking.
It's foolish to take side out of a typically one sided narrative that reminds me how we French were told the German never washed themselves and had lots of other nasty habits. Since they were the ennemy... (WW1 official French propaganda).
Exactly! If mexico set up Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles on the borders of Texas the we would bomb them back into the stone age
