Forums

This is absolutely pathetic Chess.com, do better.

Sort:
sawdof
David wrote:

The blame is with the person posting the material.

A moderator doesn't have access to abuse reports but if one had been online and in the forums, they would have actioned it: therefore there wasn't anyone looking at the forums at the time and it just needed to be brought to their attention. You could have done so by seeing which moderators and/or support staff were online and sending them a message or a chat and they would have acted straight away. ...

The criminal is definitely to blame but what about the police's responsibility? You're asking for a citizen's patrol in an environment that's actually unnecessarily helpful to criminals.

shadowtanuki
David wrote:
sawdof wrote:
David wrote:

...It would get removed quicker if you actually learned how to reach out to the Support teams for an urgent issue. Find out which ones tend to be online at the same time as you and PM them when you see it, that would actually be helpful.

Yes if the unpaid mods can't do it, the unpaid and sometimes even paying members should stalk staff and pm them as evidently nobody checks the ticketing system in time.

The problem is that people aren't as offended by the material as much as they are by Chess.com - rather than blaming the offender and helping Chess.com get rid of it, they would rather attack Chess.com because of how they feel about the site. It's faux outrage and genuine hypocrisy.

Once you've seen the same material about 100 times, sometimes being left on the site for over an hour despite steady abuse reports, yeah the website needs to take responsibility for that, apologize, and show us what they're doing to fix the situation. Are you a spokesman of theirs? What do you get out of defending their gross negligence/incompetence in this case?

sawdof
David wrote:
Posting about it in the forums - which clearly they were not looking at - does not help to get that material removed any more quickly.

This part I agree with

RonaldJosephCote

From Page 1,....post 18...... "It would get removed quicker if you actually learned how to reach out to the Support teams for an urgent issue. Find out which ones tend to be online at the same time as you and PM them when you see it, that would actually be helpful". https://www.chess.com/clubs/members/moderators I've used this method numerous times in the past 30 days to get rid of idiot box or baby.

sawdof
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

... https://www.chess.com/clubs/members/moderators I've used this method numerous times in the past 30 days to get rid of idiot box or baby.

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/site-feedback/unacceptable-irresponsible-and-negligent-to-lock-serious-feedback-topic-without-a-relevant-response?page=2#comment-108868813

Did that. It back fired.

sawdof

Wait, so now idiot is not a banned word anymore? Hallelujah. Praise the mysterious ways of chess.com. always keep the plebs guessing.

shadowtanuki

I wonder whose job it is to update the list of forbidden words. Do they have to get additions/removals approved by a high-ranking chess.com committee? Do changes happen at regular intervals, or just as often as the officer in charge of communication standards deems it necessary, or desirable, to do so?

sawdof
shadowtanuki wrote:

I wonder whose job it is to update the list of forbidden words. Do they have to get additions/removals approved by a high-ranking chess.com committee? Do changes happen at regular intervals, or just as often as the officer in charge of communication standards deems it necessary, or desirable, to do so?

they need to hire george

shadowtanuki

Noooooooo!

WTFrickenA

#40 Spot on, William

WTFrickenA
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

From Page 1,....post 18...... "It would get removed quicker if you actually learned how to reach out to the Support teams for an urgent issue. Find out which ones tend to be online at the same time as you and PM them when you see it, that would actually be helpful". https://www.chess.com/clubs/members/moderators I've used this method numerous times in the past 30 days to get rid of idiot box or baby.

😂 and you know what? Lmao it should be a requirement to have that link on every profile picture, that every member simply has a go to and find who's on to handle the proper business needed.

lol I've just added it

David
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

From Page 1,....post 18...... "It would get removed quicker if you actually learned how to reach out to the Support teams for an urgent issue. Find out which ones tend to be online at the same time as you and PM them when you see it, that would actually be helpful". https://www.chess.com/clubs/members/moderators I've used this method numerous times in the past 30 days to get rid of idiot box or baby.

And the green box tells you who is actually currently online - that's a great tip RJC.

David
sawdof wrote:
David wrote:

The blame is with the person posting the material.

A moderator doesn't have access to abuse reports but if one had been online and in the forums, they would have actioned it: therefore there wasn't anyone looking at the forums at the time and it just needed to be brought to their attention. You could have done so by seeing which moderators and/or support staff were online and sending them a message or a chat and they would have acted straight away. ...

The criminal is definitely to blame but what about the police's responsibility? You're asking for a citizen's patrol in an environment that's actually unnecessarily helpful to criminals.

There are things Chess.com could do way better, sure. Posting about those in a way that would actually be constructive is a great idea. People throwing out insults and saying that Chess.com is just a greedy corporation and refusing to actually do something to help in the meantime is what annoys me and why I post snippy shots at such people.

RonaldJosephCote

WTFrickenA

Then you're saying you feel it isn't their responsibility to pay proper individuals to take proper time to handle proper material so things run proper, showing proper interest in their otf users, David?

TiredTactician

maybe this is why the chess up 2 board doesn't include the forum as a feature.

Loki_god_of_deception

Its just funny that the mods are too scared to go to this thread

Sir_TrashPanda
Loki_god_of_deception wrote:

Its just funny that the mods are too scared to go to this thread

Please let this die. If you want to discuss this further then do it here...

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/site-feedback/unacceptable-irresponsible-and-negligent-to-lock-serious-feedback-topic-without-a-relevant-response

This forum topic has been locked