Tournament timeouts
I would wonder why anybody would want to intentionally time out in order to influence the standings; I guess unless they are teaming up with another opponent to help that other opponent get higher in the standings and either win or advance to the next round. Then, I guess the "favor" is reciprocated in a future tournament? Even then, why time out? Seems to me the person would get the same result by intentionally resigning or drawing a game that is not lost or drawn, respectively (and not increase their timeout percentage; and also not hurt their rating, if done early enough in the game), or by withdrawing from the tournament. Maybe I am missing something; I don't know.
On the other hand, I have heard of people intentionally losing or timing out in order to lower their ratings so they can qualify for tournaments against lower rated players; thus increasing the likelihood of winning the tournament. Still doesn't make sense to me, though; unless, I guess, to some, winning a tournament is that important to them. Seems a shame to me for people to intentionally lose or time out for that reason (or any other, for that matter).
Take care,
George
In a group tournament, i think if someone times out against one appointment they should forefeit all their games as if they have withdrawn. otherwise if they time out against one opponent but not others it could affect the final standings. What do others think?