Its against the site rules to discuss cheating in the main forums.
https://support.chess.com/customer/portal/articles/1444772
And judging by some of your games, it wouldnt take an engine to win.
80% of people are engine users in chess.com
Sorter:
Apr 21, 2018
0
#3
Just because you lost 10 from your last 12 games? If I analyse my games I don't see that I lost because cheating, but because I lost material. Probably you have simply a bad phase.
Apr 21, 2018
0
#5
data_scientist wrote:
shameless engine user. Chess.com has become a website that cheaters having party.
2 things i notice in your games:
Bringing your queen our early, and it getting you into trouble.
Opposite side castling. You need to know when NOT to, and when to castle on the opposite side.
Hopefully this helps:
You should castle on the opposite side when at least one of the following factors is true:
-
When you are up in development and your opponent has already castled, you should consider castling on the opposite side. That way you will have a clear game plan and will also be able to capitalize on your development advantage.
-
When you have a damaged pawn structure (doubled paws, missing pawns, far advanced pawns, etc.) on one side you should consider castling on the other side.
-
When the opponent’s pieces are especially active on one side of the board, it is usually best to castle on the opposite side.
-
If you want to complicate the game you may consider this option. That maybe true if you must play for a win due to a tournament situation, when the draw is not enough. This also maybe done when you're playing against a stronger opponent, who is much better in simple/technical positions. That maybe your best bet.
You should not castle on the opposite side when at least one of the following factors is true:
-
When you are behind in development and you need extra time to develop your pieces, it is usually not a good idea to give your opponent a straight forward way of launching an attack.
-
When the opponent’s pawns are advanced towards the side you’re about to castle, it is not a good idea to castle there (especially if the opponent’s king is castled on the opposite side). It will just give him a positional edge in the attack.
-
When there are open/semi-open files in-front of the side you’re about to castle, you should probably reconsider your decision to castle there (especially if your opponent has castled on the other side). That will give him more attacking possibilities, such as rook lifts, various sacrifices, doubling of pieces on the file, etc.
-
If you playing against a weaker opponent you may want to avoid castling opposite sides, in order to avoid sharp game and keep everything under control.
Note: These are general rules, not laws, meaning that there are always exceptions to them. When you’re making a decision on what side to castle you should always take your time and evaluate all “pros” and “cons”and base your decision upon your own analysis. This is a very important decision. It pretty much dictates which way the game will continue. Take your time and think twice.
Kmatta wrote:
In befor the lock
Put me in the screenshot
in before the lock
Apr 21, 2018
0
#10
DiscipleofDaVinci wrote:
You lose 55% of your games yet you claim 80% of your opponents are engine users...
He accounts for the other 25% 😱
"the way" you are getting beaten is not "the way" an engine would beat you...
Not sure 80% of the members could even afford to buy one!!
Apr 21, 2018
0
#14
52yrral wrote:
Not sure 80% of the members could even afford to buy one!!
In China the engine buys you
shameless engine user. Chess.com has become a website that cheaters having party.